Tarun Chatterjee

Supreme Court settles norms for sanctioning Junior Assistant posts in minority schools: State of Tamil Nadu vs. Amala Annai Higher Secondary School (28 August 2009)

/ Conditions of Service, Constitutional Law, Judges, R.M. Lodha, Sanction of Posts, Service Law, Tarun Chatterjee, Writ Petition

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 28 August 2009 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, R.M. Lodha Imagine a school struggling to get approval for a staff member. Does the government have the final say, even years after the initial request? The Supreme Court of India addressed this very issue in a case involving Amala Annai Higher Secondary School, […]

Supreme Court settles norms for sanctioning Junior Assistant posts in minority schools: State of Tamil Nadu vs. Amala Annai Higher Secondary School (28 August 2009) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Abolishment of Media Prabhari Post: State of U.P. vs. Diwakar Khare (2008)

/ Abolition of Post, Aftab Alam, Interim Relief, Judges, Service Law, Tarun Chatterjee

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 03, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can a High Court grant interim relief allowing someone to continue in a post that has already been abolished by the government? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of

Supreme Court Upholds Abolishment of Media Prabhari Post: State of U.P. vs. Diwakar Khare (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles criteria for Professor appointment in Universities: B.C. Mylarappa vs. Dr. R. Venkatasubbaiah (2008)

/ Appointment, Education Law, Harjit Singh Bedi, Judges, Professor Eligibility, Research Experience, Seniority, Service Law, Tarun Chatterjee, University Appointments

“`html Date of the Judgment: October 03, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Can prior experience as a Research Assistant be considered equivalent to postgraduate teaching experience when applying for the post of Professor in a University? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in

Supreme Court settles criteria for Professor appointment in Universities: B.C. Mylarappa vs. Dr. R. Venkatasubbaiah (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the status of part-time employees under Section 2(s) and 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act: Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. vs. A. Sankaralingam (2008)

/ Harjit Singh Bedi, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(s), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, Tarun Chatterjee

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 03, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 4445 of 2006 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Does a part-time employee qualify as a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act, entitling them to protection against unlawful retrenchment? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in the case of Div.

Supreme Court settles the status of part-time employees under Section 2(s) and 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act: Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. vs. A. Sankaralingam (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “Unfair Trade Practice” under MRTP Act: KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Case (October 3, 2008)

/ Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Deficiency in Service, Judges, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36A, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 48C, Mukundakam Sharma, Tarun Chatterjee, Unfair Trade Practice

Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 815-816 of 2002 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. What constitutes an unfair trade practice under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (MRTP Act)? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case involving KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and a

Supreme Court clarifies “Unfair Trade Practice” under MRTP Act: KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Case (October 3, 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the existence of an arbitration agreement despite the absence of signatures on formal contract: M/s. Unissi (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (2008)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 7, Dalveer Bhandari, Judges, Tarun Chatterjee

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 01, 2008 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Dalveer Bhandari, J. Does the absence of a formal signed agreement negate the existence of an arbitration agreement when parties have acted upon the terms of a tender containing an arbitration clause? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a

Supreme Court settles the existence of an arbitration agreement despite the absence of signatures on formal contract: M/s. Unissi (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles limitation period for recovery of money in commercial transactions: Krishna Gopal Kakani vs. Bank of Baroda (2008)

/ Harjit Singh Bedi, Indian Trusts Act, Indian Trusts Act with Section 88, Judges, Limitation Act, Limitation Act with Article 113, Limitation Act with Article 22, Limitation Act with Section 10, Tarun Chatterjee

Date of the Judgment: September 30, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. When does the limitation period begin for recovering money in a commercial transaction? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a dispute between Krishna Gopal Kakani and Bank of Baroda.

Supreme Court settles limitation period for recovery of money in commercial transactions: Krishna Gopal Kakani vs. Bank of Baroda (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the requirement of notice under Section 80 of CPC when a public officer is a party for consequential relief: Ram Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan (2008)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 80, Dalveer Bhandari, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Dispute, Revenue Department, Tarun Chatterjee

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 29, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Dalveer Bhandari, J. Do you need to serve a government official with a notice before suing them, even if they’re only involved in a minor way? The Supreme Court of India clarified this issue in the case of

Supreme Court settles the requirement of notice under Section 80 of CPC when a public officer is a party for consequential relief: Ram Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the scope of Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC in setting aside ex-parte decrees: Bank of India vs. M/s Mehta Brothers (23 September 2008)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order 9 Rule 13, Dalveer Bhandari, Judges, Tarun Chatterjee

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2008 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Justice Tarun Chatterjee, Justice Dalveer Bhandari When can a court set aside a decree against some defendants when only one defendant applies to set aside an ex-parte decree? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court settles the scope of Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC in setting aside ex-parte decrees: Bank of India vs. M/s Mehta Brothers (23 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Arbitration: M/s Shakti Bhog Foods Limited vs. Kola Shipping Limited (2008)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 45, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 7, Dalveer Bhandari, Judges, Tarun Chatterjee

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 23, 2008 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Dalveer Bhandari, J. When disputes arise in international commercial agreements, how should courts approach arbitration clauses? This question was addressed by the Supreme Court of India in a case between M/s Shakti Bhog Foods Limited and Kola Shipping Limited. The core issue revolved

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Arbitration: M/s Shakti Bhog Foods Limited vs. Kola Shipping Limited (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Re-Deployment Policy for Retrenched Employees in Labour Law: K. Alex vs. Delhi State Mineral Dev. Corpn. (23 September 2008)

/ Central Civil Services Rules, Central Civil Services Rules with Rule 5, Constitutional Law, Harjit Singh Bedi, Judges, Labour Law, Re-Deployment Policy, Right to Equality, Tarun Chatterjee, Termination of Service

Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5797 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 14337 of 2006) Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Can an employer selectively deny re-deployment to a retrenched employee when a company policy mandates it? The Supreme Court of India, in K. Alex

Supreme Court settles Re-Deployment Policy for Retrenched Employees in Labour Law: K. Alex vs. Delhi State Mineral Dev. Corpn. (23 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles appointment process for Extra Departmental Branch Post Master: T. Jayakumar vs. A. Gopu (2008)

/ Administrative Law, Aftab Alam, Appointment Process, Judges, Scope of Judicial Review, Tarun Chatterjee

Date of the Judgment: September 22, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. When is a delayed application not really delayed? The Supreme Court addressed the complications arising from a candidate’s omission to sign an application for the position of Extra Departmental Branch Post Master (EDBPM) in Kadambadi village.

Supreme Court settles appointment process for Extra Departmental Branch Post Master: T. Jayakumar vs. A. Gopu (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top