Supreme Court Clarifies Limits on Registrar’s Power in Public Trust Property Sales: Parsi Zoroastrian Anjuman vs. Registrar of Public Trusts (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of the Registrar’s power to grant or refuse sanction for the sale of public trust property under Section 14 of the Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951. CASE TYPE: Public Trust […]
Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Regarding Teacher Recruitment: Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Citation: Not Available in the document Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a review petition be entertained if it does not present any new substantial arguments?
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a previous order of the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Civil Review Petition. Case Name: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Hon’ble Allahabad High Court. [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022. Introduction Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022.
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 40 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a review petition be entertained if it does not point out any error apparent on the record?
Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit J., Ajay Rastogi J. Can a review petition be entertained if there is an inordinate delay in filing the special leave petition? The Supreme Court addressed this issue in a recent case where a review petition was dismissed due to a significant delay in
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a previous order of the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Civil Review Petition Case Name: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Hon’ble Allahabad High Court Through Its Registrar General [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022 Date of the Judgment:
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Due to Delay: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a review petition can be entertained despite an unexplained and substantial delay. CASE TYPE: Civil Review Petition Case Name: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana and Another [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment:
Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Regarding Teacher Selection: Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the selection process for teachers should be concluded based on an earlier notification, despite a subsequent decision allowing for a fresh selection process. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Sunil Kumar Yadav and Others
Supreme Court Upholds Normalization of Marks for UP Police Sub-Inspector Exam LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the normalization of marks for a multi-session exam should be applied before determining eligibility or only for preparing the final merit list. CASE TYPE: Service Law – Recruitment Case Name: State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. vs. Atul Kumar Dwivedi &
NCCF Status as State Under Article 12: Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Petitions LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Co-operative Consumer Federation of India Limited (NCCF) is a “State” under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Writ Petition Case Name: N.C.C.F. Employees Union (Regd)(Recognized) & Anr. vs. Union of India &
Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Petitions on NCCF’s Status as ‘State’ LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Co-operative Consumers’ Federation of India Limited (NCCF) is a ‘State’ under Article 12 of the Constitution of India and thus subject to writ jurisdiction. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: N.C.C.F. Employees Union (Regd)(Recognized) & Anr. vs. Union of
Supreme Court Clarifies Horizontal Reservation in Assistant Professor Selections LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Other Backward Class (OBC) female candidates who score higher than General Category women in the Assistant Professor selection process can be placed in the unreserved female category. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Reservation Policy Case Name: Sadhana Singh Dangi & Others vs. Pinki Asati
