Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ownership: Harwansh Kaur vs. SADA (2021)

/ Civil Law, Judges, Land Ownership Dispute, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code with Section 158(3)(1), Review Jurisdiction, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ownership: Harwansh Kaur vs. SADA (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can exercise review jurisdiction to re-examine issues already decided on merits. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Ownership Dispute Case Name: Harwansh Kaur & Anr. vs. Special Area Development Authority (Counter Magnet), Gwalior & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 22 October […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ownership: Harwansh Kaur vs. SADA (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Goutam Joardar vs. State of West Bengal (2021)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 27(3), Bela M. Trivedi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Goutam Joardar vs. State of West Bengal (2021) Date of the Judgment: October 7, 2021 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Bela M. Trivedi Can a delay in recording witness statements be fatal to a prosecution’s case? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Goutam Joardar vs. State of West Bengal (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Recalls Custody Order, Cites Fraud in Child Custody Battle: Smriti Madan Kansagra vs. Perry Kansagra (2021)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 53, Fundamental Rights, Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890, Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 10, Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 7, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Recalls Custody Order, Cites Fraud in Smriti Madan Kansagra vs. Perry Kansagra (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Fraudulent procurement of a child custody order. CASE TYPE: Family Law, Guardianship. Case Name: Smriti Madan Kansagra vs. Perry Kansagra. Judgment Date: 7 October 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 7 October 2021 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday

Supreme Court Recalls Custody Order, Cites Fraud in Child Custody Battle: Smriti Madan Kansagra vs. Perry Kansagra (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Insurer’s Right to Repudiate Claim Due to Expired Temporary Vehicle Registration: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sushil Kumar Godara (2021)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Insurance Law, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 192, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 39, Repudiation of Claims, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vehicle Insurance

Supreme Court Upholds Insurer’s Right to Repudiate Claim Due to Expired Temporary Vehicle Registration Date of the Judgment: September 30, 2021 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5887 of 2021 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., S. Ravindra Bhat, J., Bela M. Trivedi, J. (authored by S. Ravindra Bhat, J.) Can an insurance company deny a claim if

Supreme Court Upholds Insurer’s Right to Repudiate Claim Due to Expired Temporary Vehicle Registration: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sushil Kumar Godara (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Permits Withdrawal of Appeals in Income Tax Case: Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (29 September 2021)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Income Tax, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Appeals, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Supreme Court Procedure, Supreme Court Procedure with Appeals, Uday Umesh Lalit, Withdrawal of Appeals

Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeals LEGAL ISSUE: Withdrawal of appeals by the appellant. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Case Name: Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax [Judgment Date]: 29 September 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 29 September 2021 Judges: Uday

Supreme Court Permits Withdrawal of Appeals in Income Tax Case: Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (29 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale, Dismisses Challenge to Ex-Parte Decree: Vishwabhandhu vs. Sri Krishna (2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order IX, Code of Civil Procedure with Order V, General Clauses Act, 1897, General Clauses Act, 1897 with Section 27, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale, Dismisses Challenge to Ex-Parte Decree: Vishwabhandhu vs. Sri Krishna (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an ex-parte decree should be set aside when the defendant had knowledge of the proceedings and failed to appear, and whether an auction sale conducted subsequently should be upheld. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Auction Sale and

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale, Dismisses Challenge to Ex-Parte Decree: Vishwabhandhu vs. Sri Krishna (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds PNGRB Regulations on City Gas Distribution: Adani Gas vs. Union of India (28 September 2021)

/ City Gas Distribution, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 with Section 16, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 with Section 17, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds PNGRB Regulations on City Gas Distribution: Adani Gas vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “deemed authorization” under the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 (PNGRB Act) and the validity of regulations for city gas distribution networks. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction – Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory

Supreme Court Upholds PNGRB Regulations on City Gas Distribution: Adani Gas vs. Union of India (28 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds IIT Admission Criteria: IIT Kharagpur vs. Soutrik Sarangi (2021)

/ Admission Standards, Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Institutes of Technology Act, 1961, Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 with Section 33(2)(b), Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds IIT Admission Criteria: IIT Kharagpur vs. Soutrik Sarangi (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the eligibility criteria for Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) Advanced, which restricts candidates who have already taken admission in an Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) from appearing again, is valid. CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Supreme Court Upholds IIT Admission Criteria: IIT Kharagpur vs. Soutrik Sarangi (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Bail for Corruption Accused: Rakesh Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (24 September 2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Orders Bail for Corruption Accused: Rakesh Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2021) Date of the Judgment: 24 September 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 637 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit J., S. Ravindra Bhat J. Can an accused person be arrested after the investigation is complete, especially when the charges relate to corruption? The Supreme

Supreme Court Orders Bail for Corruption Accused: Rakesh Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (24 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces sentence for culpable homicide not amounting to murder: Pawan Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2021) INSC 629 (24 September 2021)

/ Culpable Homicide, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court reduces sentence for culpable homicide not amounting to murder: Pawan Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2021) INSC 629 (24 September 2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 should be under Part I or Part II, considering the nature of the injuries and

Supreme Court reduces sentence for culpable homicide not amounting to murder: Pawan Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2021) INSC 629 (24 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Dowry Death Case: Nisha vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021)

/ Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 3, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 4, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Dowry Death Case: Nisha vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving offences related to dowry death and harassment. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Nisha vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [Judgment Date]: September 24, 2021 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Dowry Death Case: Nisha vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of audit for Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple and its Trust: Marthanda Varma vs. State of Kerala (22 September 2021)

/ Audit of Religious Institutions, Bela M. Trivedi, Judges, Religious and Charitable Endowments, Religious and Charitable Endowments with Travancore Cochin Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1950, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Audit for Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple and Trust LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the special audit of Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple should also include the Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust (SPSTT). CASE TYPE: Religious and Charitable Endowments. Case Name: Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Th. Lrs. & Ors. vs. State of Kerala &

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of audit for Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple and its Trust: Marthanda Varma vs. State of Kerala (22 September 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top