Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Karnataka Reservation Act 2018: B.K. Pavitra II (May 10, 2019)

/ Consequential Seniority, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 335, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Reservation in Promotions, Seniority Rules, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Reservation Act 2018: B.K. Pavitra II LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of the Karnataka Extension of Consequential Seniority Act, 2018. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Reservation in Promotions. Case Name: B.K. Pavitra and Ors. vs. The Union of India and Ors. Judgment Date: May 10, 2019 Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2019 Citation: Not […]

Supreme Court Upholds Karnataka Reservation Act 2018: B.K. Pavitra II (May 10, 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: Narad Patel vs. State of Chhattisgarh (10 May 2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 294, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 506, Judges, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(1)(x), Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: Narad Patel vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2019) Date of the Judgment: 10 May 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 448 Judges: Arun Mishra, J. and Uday Umesh Lalit, J. Can a person be convicted under Section 3(1)(x)

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: Narad Patel vs. State of Chhattisgarh (10 May 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Interest on Differential Excise Duty: Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur (2019)

/ Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 11AB, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 4, Central Excise Rules, 2002, Central Excise Rules, 2002 with Rule 7, Central Excise Rules, 2002 with Rule 8, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Ranjan Gogoi, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Interest on Differential Excise Duty: Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether interest is payable on differential excise duty with retrospective effect under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, when prices are revised due to an escalation clause. CASE TYPE: Central Excise

Supreme Court Upholds Interest on Differential Excise Duty: Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Construction of New Building to Resolve Housing Society Dispute: Sant Lal Gupta vs. Umesh Kumar Jain (2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Contempt of Court, Cooperative Society Law, Judges, Modern Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited, Order 39, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Directs Construction of New Building to Resolve Housing Society Dispute: Sant Lal Gupta vs. Umesh Kumar Jain (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Enforcement of a court order and addressing the rights of both original and subsequently inducted members of a housing society. CASE TYPE: Contempt Petition in a Civil Matter Case Name: Sant Lal Gupta

Supreme Court Directs Construction of New Building to Resolve Housing Society Dispute: Sant Lal Gupta vs. Umesh Kumar Jain (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Promotion Rights After Cadre Restructuring in Orissa Administrative Service Case (2019)

/ Cadre Restructuring, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 309, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Promotion, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vested Rights

Supreme Court Clarifies Promotion Rights After Cadre Restructuring in Orissa Administrative Service Case (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates have a vested right to promotion based on recommendations when the cadre is restructured and the original posts are abolished. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Orissa & Anr. vs. Dhirendra Sundar Das & Ors.

Supreme Court Clarifies Promotion Rights After Cadre Restructuring in Orissa Administrative Service Case (2019) Read Post »

Maintainability of Revision Petition in Execution Proceedings: Supreme Court clarifies under Consumer Protection Act (2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order 45, Consumer Disputes, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 21, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 25, Execution of Decrees, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of revision petition in execution proceedings under Consumer Protection Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a revision petition is maintainable before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission against an order passed by the State Commission in an appeal arising out of execution proceedings. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Karnataka Housing Board vs.

Maintainability of Revision Petition in Execution Proceedings: Supreme Court clarifies under Consumer Protection Act (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Consumer Dispute: Jiten K. Ajmera vs. Tejas Co-operative Housing Society (2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLI Rule 27, Consumer Disputes Redressal, Consumer Law, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Consumer Dispute: Jiten K. Ajmera vs. Tejas Co-operative Housing Society (2019) Date of the Judgment: May 6, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 448 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can new evidence be introduced at the appellate stage in a consumer dispute? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Consumer Dispute: Jiten K. Ajmera vs. Tejas Co-operative Housing Society (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reinstates Compulsory Retirement Review: State of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Farid Ahmad Tak (2019)

/ Compulsory Retirement, Indu Malhotra, Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations, Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations with Article 226(2), Judges, Ranbir Penal Code, Ranbir Penal Code with Section 120-B, Service Law, Service Law with Article 226(2), Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Reinstates Compulsory Retirement Review: State of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Farid Ahmad Tak (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in setting aside the order of compulsory retirement of the respondent. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors. vs. Farid Ahmad Tak [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Reinstates Compulsory Retirement Review: State of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Farid Ahmad Tak (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation in Rupnagar Acquisition Case: Sardara Singh & Ors. vs. Land Acquisition Collector (24 April 2019)

/ Indu Malhotra, Judges, Land Acquisition, Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922, Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 with Section 36, Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 with Section 42, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation in Rupnagar Acquisition Case LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Sardara Singh & Ors. vs. Land Acquisition Collector, Improvement Trust, Rupnagar & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 24 April 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 24

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation in Rupnagar Acquisition Case: Sardara Singh & Ors. vs. Land Acquisition Collector (24 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court holds Finance Company Liable for Delay in Insurance Policy Issuance: Ashatai vs. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. (2019)

/ Consumer Complaint, Consumer Law, Deficiency of Service, Indu Malhotra, Insurance Act, 1938, Insurance Act, 1938 with Section 64VB, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Holds Finance Company Liable for Delay in Insurance Policy Issuance: Ashatai vs. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a finance company is liable for deficiency of service for delaying the issuance of an insurance policy linked to a loan, resulting in non-payment of the loan amount upon the borrower’s death.

Supreme Court holds Finance Company Liable for Delay in Insurance Policy Issuance: Ashatai vs. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes regularization obtained by fraud: Punjab Urban Planning vs. Karamjit Singh (2019)

/ Disciplinary Inquiry, Fraudulent Appointment, Indu Malhotra, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-F, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-H, Judges, Regularization, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court quashes regularization obtained by fraud: Punjab Urban Planning vs. Karamjit Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee who fraudulently obtains regularization is entitled to a disciplinary inquiry before termination. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority & Anr. vs. Karamjit Singh [Judgment Date]: April 15, 2019 Date of

Supreme Court quashes regularization obtained by fraud: Punjab Urban Planning vs. Karamjit Singh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Partial Retrial for Witness Examination in Criminal Cases

/ Appellate Courts, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 273, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 386, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Partial Retrial for Witness Examination in Criminal Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a trial is vitiated if witness testimony is recorded without the accused being present, and if so, whether a partial retrial can be ordered to rectify the error. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Atma Ram & Ors. vs. State of

Supreme Court Upholds Partial Retrial for Witness Examination in Criminal Cases Read Post »

Scroll to Top