Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Cooperative Society’s Right to Redevelop Property: Bengal Secretariat Cooperative Land Mortgage Bank vs. Sri Aloke Kumar (2022)

/ J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit, West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006, West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006 with Section 28, West Bengal Co-operative Societies Rules, 2011, West Bengal Co-operative Societies Rules, 2011 with Rule 21

Supreme Court Upholds Cooperative Society’s Right to Redevelop Property: Bengal Secretariat Cooperative Land Mortgage Bank vs. Sri Aloke Kumar (2022) Date of the Judgment: October 13, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1234 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI, S. Ravindra Bhat, J., J.B. Pardiwala, J. Can a single member of a cooperative society stall a redevelopment project […]

Supreme Court Upholds Cooperative Society’s Right to Redevelop Property: Bengal Secretariat Cooperative Land Mortgage Bank vs. Sri Aloke Kumar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns murder conviction due to weak circumstantial evidence: Subramanya vs. State of Karnataka (2022) INSC 487

/ Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 27, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 8, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court overturns murder conviction due to weak circumstantial evidence: Subramanya vs. State of Karnataka (2022) INSC 487 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a murder conviction can be sustained based on weak circumstantial evidence and an extra-judicial confession. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Subramanya vs. State of Karnataka Judgment Date: 13 October 2022 Date of the

Supreme Court overturns murder conviction due to weak circumstantial evidence: Subramanya vs. State of Karnataka (2022) INSC 487 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies deductibility of employee contributions under Income Tax Act: Checkmate Services P. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 (2022)

/ Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 2(24)(x), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 36(1)(va), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 43B, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies Deductibility of Employee Contributions Under Income Tax Act LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding the deductibility of employee contributions to provident funds and other welfare funds. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Case Name: Checkmate Services P. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 Judgment

Supreme Court clarifies deductibility of employee contributions under Income Tax Act: Checkmate Services P. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to flawed evidence: Munikrishna vs. State (2022)

/ Confession, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 20(3), Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 25, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to flawed evidence: Munikrishna vs. State (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Admissibility of confessional statements made to police and the evaluation of circumstantial evidence in a criminal trial. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Munikrishna @ Krishna Etc. vs. State by Ulsoor PS [Judgment Date]: 30 September 2022 Date

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to flawed evidence: Munikrishna vs. State (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes detention order under PIT NDPS Act due to delay and suppression of facts: Sushanta Kumar Banik vs. State of Tripura (2022) INSC 771 (30 September 2022)

/ J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 37, Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988, Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 with Section 3(1), Preventive Detention, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court quashes detention order under PIT NDPS Act due to delay and suppression of facts: Sushanta Kumar Banik vs. State of Tripura (2022) INSC 771 (30 September 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a detention order under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (PIT NDPS Act) can be quashed

Supreme Court quashes detention order under PIT NDPS Act due to delay and suppression of facts: Sushanta Kumar Banik vs. State of Tripura (2022) INSC 771 (30 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Order to Summon Witness in Rape Case: Ritu Rai vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 328, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 506, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Order to Summon Witness in Rape Case: Ritu Rai vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 29, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 887 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and J.B. Pardiwala, J. Can a trial court summon a witness to verify a document crucial to the case,

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Order to Summon Witness in Rape Case: Ritu Rai vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court disposes of Andhra Pradesh-Karnataka River Water Dispute Suit: State of Andhra Pradesh v. State of Karnataka (2022) INSC 823 (28 September 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Inter-State Disputes, Inter-State River Water Disputes, Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 with Water Disputes Tribunal, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court disposes of Andhra Pradesh-Karnataka River Water Dispute Suit Date of the Judgment: 28 September 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 823 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI, S. Ravindra Bhat, J., J.B. Pardiwala, J. Can a decades-old water dispute be resolved without a formal adjudication? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a

Supreme Court disposes of Andhra Pradesh-Karnataka River Water Dispute Suit: State of Andhra Pradesh v. State of Karnataka (2022) INSC 823 (28 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of plea challenging Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act: Munilal & Ors. vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Anr. (28 September 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, J.B. Pardiwala, Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act, 2005, Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act, 2005, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of plea challenging Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act: Munilal & Ors. vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Anr. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 September 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI., S. Ravindra Bhat, J., J.B. Pardiwala, J. Can a petition challenging the validity of a law

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of plea challenging Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act: Munilal & Ors. vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Anr. (28 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Speaker’s Power on Disqualification: Gyanendra Kumar vs Bihar Legislative Assembly (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Paragraph 2(1)(a) of the Tenth Schedule, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Limits Speaker’s Power on Disqualification: Gyanendra Kumar vs Bihar Legislative Assembly (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of the Speaker’s powers under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution regarding disqualification of members of a legislative assembly. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law – Disqualification of Legislators Case Name: Gyanendra Kumar & Ors. vs. Bihar Legislative Assembly, Patna

Supreme Court Limits Speaker’s Power on Disqualification: Gyanendra Kumar vs Bihar Legislative Assembly (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “salary” to include leave encashment and gratuity for aided school teachers: Jagdish Prasad Saini vs. State of Rajasthan (26 September 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 309, Judges, Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989, Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 with Section 2(d), Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 with Section 2(r), Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 with Section 29, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court clarifies “salary” to include leave encashment and gratuity for aided school teachers: Jagdish Prasad Saini vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the term “salary” includes leave encashment and gratuity for employees of aided educational institutions in Rajasthan. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Jagdish Prasad Saini & Ors. vs. State of

Supreme Court clarifies “salary” to include leave encashment and gratuity for aided school teachers: Jagdish Prasad Saini vs. State of Rajasthan (26 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Singh Brothers in Contempt for Asset Diversion in Daiichi Sankyo Case (22 September 2022)

/ Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 48, Civil Contempt, Contempt of Court, Contempt of Court with Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Indira Banerjee, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Holds Singh Brothers in Contempt for Asset Diversion in Daiichi Sankyo Case LEGAL ISSUE: Contempt of Court for violating orders and undertakings related to asset preservation in an international arbitration enforcement. CASE TYPE: Civil Contempt, Arbitration Enforcement Case Name: M/s. Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited vs. Oscar Investments Limited & Ors. Judgment Date: 22

Supreme Court Holds Singh Brothers in Contempt for Asset Diversion in Daiichi Sankyo Case (22 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Resolves Land Dispute between NOIDA and Cooperative Society: Allotment of Flats Ordered (22 September 2022)

/ Indira Banerjee, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Land Transfers, U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 with Section 154, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Resolves Land Dispute between NOIDA and Cooperative Society Date of the Judgment: 22 September 2022 Citation: (Not Available in Source) Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI, Indira Banerjee J., K.M. Joseph J. Can a long-standing land dispute between a development authority and a cooperative society be resolved by ensuring housing for its members? The

Supreme Court Resolves Land Dispute between NOIDA and Cooperative Society: Allotment of Flats Ordered (22 September 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top