Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court to decide on mandatory separate hearing for death penalty cases

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 235, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 309, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 354, Constitutional Law, Fundamental Rights, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court to decide on mandatory separate hearing for death penalty cases Date of the Judgment: 19 September 2022 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI, S. Ravindra Bhat, J, Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. The Supreme Court of India is grappling with a critical question: Should a separate hearing be mandatory after a conviction in cases where the […]

Supreme Court to decide on mandatory separate hearing for death penalty cases Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification for False Asset Declaration in Municipal Elections: S. Rukmini Madegowda vs. State Election Commission (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 243ZA(1), Constitutional Law with Article 324, Corrupt Practices, Election Law, Election Law with Section 123(2) of Representation of the People Act, 1951, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification for False Asset Declaration in Municipal Elections LEGAL ISSUE: Whether non-disclosure of assets by a candidate in municipal elections constitutes a corrupt practice leading to disqualification. CASE TYPE: Election Law Case Name: S. Rukmini Madegowda vs. The State Election Commission & Ors. Judgment Date: 14 September 2022 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification for False Asset Declaration in Municipal Elections: S. Rukmini Madegowda vs. State Election Commission (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Intestate Succession in Faridkot Royal Family Dispute (2022)

/ Civil Law, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 5, Intestate Succession, Judges, Property Law, S. Ravindra Bhat, Succession Law, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Intestate Succession in Faridkot Royal Family Dispute (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Rule of Primogeniture and validity of a will in matters of succession to private properties of a former ruler. CASE TYPE: Civil Succession Dispute Case Name: Maharani Deepinder Kaur (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. and Ors. vs. Rajkumari Amrit Kaur

Supreme Court Upholds Intestate Succession in Faridkot Royal Family Dispute (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Closes Contempt Petitions in Property Dispute: N. Srinivasa Rao vs. Smt. Ranjeev R. Acharya (2022)

/ Civil Procedure, Contempt of Court, Inherent Jurisdiction of Supreme Court, Judges, Property Dispute, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Closes Contempt Petitions in Property Dispute: N. Srinivasa Rao vs. Smt. Ranjeev R. Acharya (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether contempt petitions related to a property dispute should be entertained. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court, Property Dispute Case Name: N. Srinivasa Rao vs. Smt. Ranjeev R. Acharya & Anr. and Govindraj & Ors. vs. Smt.

Supreme Court Closes Contempt Petitions in Property Dispute: N. Srinivasa Rao vs. Smt. Ranjeev R. Acharya (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Benami Transactions within Hindu Undivided Families: Pushpalata vs. Vijay Kumar (2022) INSC 756

/ Benami Transaction, Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 4, Hindu Law, Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court on Benami Transactions in HUF Property: Pushpalata vs. Vijay Kumar (2022) INSC 756 LEGAL ISSUE: The legal issue in this case is whether a property purchased by the Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) in the name of a family member can be considered a benami transaction, and if so, whether it

Supreme Court clarifies Benami Transactions within Hindu Undivided Families: Pushpalata vs. Vijay Kumar (2022) INSC 756 Read Post »

Supreme Court dismisses transfer petition, directs speedy trial in family dispute: Surjit Kishore Das vs. Ajay Kishore Das (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court dismisses transfer petition, directs speedy trial in family dispute: Surjit Kishore Das vs. Ajay Kishore Das (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a transfer petition should be allowed. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Surjit Kishore Das vs. Ajay Kishore Das & Ors. Judgment Date: 05 September 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2022

Supreme Court dismisses transfer petition, directs speedy trial in family dispute: Surjit Kishore Das vs. Ajay Kishore Das (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court declines transfer of petitions in matrimonial dispute: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Inherent Powers, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court declines transfer of petitions in matrimonial dispute: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether to transfer petitions in matrimonial disputes from one family court to another. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute, Transfer Petition. Case Name: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka [Judgment Date]: September 5, 2022 Date of the

Supreme Court declines transfer of petitions in matrimonial dispute: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Cases: Monika Kumari vs. Abhishek Yadav (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Family Law, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Matrimonial Cases, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Cases: Monika Kumari vs. Abhishek Yadav (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of matrimonial cases from one family court to another. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Law Case Name: Monika Kumari vs. Abhishek Yadav [Judgment Date]: 05 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Cases: Monika Kumari vs. Abhishek Yadav (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Aprajita Chakraborty vs. Anirban Biswangri (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Judges, Matrimonial Law, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Aprajita Chakraborty vs. Anirban Biswangri (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of a matrimonial dispute case. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute Case Name: Aprajita Chakraborty vs. Anirban Biswangri Judgment Date: 05 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and S. Ravindra Bhat, J.

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Aprajita Chakraborty vs. Anirban Biswangri (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Matrimonial Dispute: Neelam Parashar vs. Shashank Sharma (2022)

/ Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer Petitions, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Matrimonial Dispute: Neelam Parashar vs. Shashank Sharma (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a matrimonial case should be transferred from one family court to another based on the petitioner’s request. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute, Transfer Petition Case Name: Neelam Parashar vs. Shashank Sharma Judgment Date: 05 September 2022 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Matrimonial Dispute: Neelam Parashar vs. Shashank Sharma (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Matrimonial Case: Pinki vs. Abhishek Kumar Singh (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Family Law, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Pinki vs. Abhishek Kumar Singh (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 5, 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI, S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a wife seek the transfer of a matrimonial case filed by her husband to a court closer to her residence? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Matrimonial Case: Pinki vs. Abhishek Kumar Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court transfers matrimonial case from Lucknow to Surat: Saloni Agrawal vs. Surbhit Mittal (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court transfers matrimonial case from Lucknow to Surat: Saloni Agrawal vs. Surbhit Mittal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of matrimonial case from one family court to another. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Law Case Name: Saloni Agrawal vs. Surbhit Mittal [Judgment Date]: September 5, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 5, 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges:

Supreme Court transfers matrimonial case from Lucknow to Surat: Saloni Agrawal vs. Surbhit Mittal (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top