Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case: Surbhi Goyal vs. Ashutosh Banka (2022)

/ Family Law, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case: Surbhi Goyal vs. Ashutosh Banka (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of a divorce petition between family courts. CASE TYPE: Family Law Case Name: Surbhi Goyal (Agrawal) vs. Ashutosh Banka [Judgment Date]: 05 September 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and […]

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case: Surbhi Goyal vs. Ashutosh Banka (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Convenience of Wife: Aastha Manoj Sonwane vs. Manoj Tukaram Sonwane (2022)

/ Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 9, Judges, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Convenience of Wife: Aastha Manoj Sonwane vs. Manoj Tukaram Sonwane (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 5, 2022 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI, and S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a matrimonial dispute be transferred to a court that is more convenient for the wife? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Convenience of Wife: Aastha Manoj Sonwane vs. Manoj Tukaram Sonwane (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings in matrimonial dispute after settlement: Jasmair Singh & Anr. vs. State of Haryana & Anr. (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Quashing of FIR, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Based on Settlement Date of the Judgment: September 5, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 808 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a criminal case arising from a matrimonial dispute be quashed if the parties reach a settlement? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings in matrimonial dispute after settlement: Jasmair Singh & Anr. vs. State of Haryana & Anr. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Rape Case: Beerbal Prasad Rajoriya vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

/ Anticipatory Bail, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376(2)(N), Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 506, Judges, Offences Against Women, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Rape Case: Beerbal Prasad Rajoriya vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 5, 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can an individual be granted anticipatory bail in a rape case? The Supreme Court addressed this

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Rape Case: Beerbal Prasad Rajoriya vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Kahkansha Anjum Khan vs. Mohammad Wamique Ansari (2022)

/ Family Law, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, Muslim Law, Muslim Law with Section 281, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Kahkansha Anjum Khan vs. Mohammad Wamique Ansari (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 5, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 824 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a matrimonial dispute be transferred to a court more convenient for the wife? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Kahkansha Anjum Khan vs. Mohammad Wamique Ansari (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Charges in Land Dispute: P. Vijay Nataraj & Ors. vs. State & Anr. (2022)

/ Judges, Land Disputes, Property Law, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sale of Property, Section 38, Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Charges in Land Dispute: P. Vijay Nataraj & Ors. vs. State & Anr. (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 5, 2022 Citation: P. Vijay Nataraj & Ors. vs. State & Anr., Criminal Appeal No.1448 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No.3826 of 2022) Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and S.

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Charges in Land Dispute: P. Vijay Nataraj & Ors. vs. State & Anr. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies ‘Transfer’ in Land Acquisition Cases: Rameshwar vs. State of Haryana (21 July 2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies ‘Transfer’ in Land Acquisition Cases: Rameshwar vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of the term ‘transfer’ in the context of land acquisition and development agreements. CASE TYPE: Civil, Land Acquisition. Case Name: Rameshwar and Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. Judgment Date: 21 July 2022 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Clarifies ‘Transfer’ in Land Acquisition Cases: Rameshwar vs. State of Haryana (21 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeals in Multiple Cases Related to NCLAT Orders

/ Company Appeal, Corporate Law, Judges, NCLAT, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit, Withdrawal of Appeals

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeals in Multiple Cases Related to NCLAT Orders LEGAL ISSUE: Withdrawal of appeals based on the final order passed by the appellate tribunal. CASE TYPE: Corporate Law, specifically concerning appeals against orders of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). Case Name: L&T Infrastructure Finance Company Limited & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeals in Multiple Cases Related to NCLAT Orders Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Imprisonment and Recovery in Contempt Case Against Vijay Mallya

/ Civil Contempt, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 129, Contempt of Courts Act, Contempt of Courts Act with Contempt, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Orders Imprisonment and Recovery in Contempt Case Against Vijay Mallya LEGAL ISSUE: Contempt of Court for Disobeying Orders and Transferring Funds CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court Case Name: State Bank of India and Ors. vs. Dr. Vijay Mallya Judgment Date: July 11, 2022 Date of the Judgment: July 11, 2022 Citation: Not Available

Supreme Court Orders Imprisonment and Recovery in Contempt Case Against Vijay Mallya Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment in Terror Conspiracy Case: Mohammad Irfan vs. State of Karnataka (2022)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 25, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 26, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 196, Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Explosive Substances Act, 1908 with Section 5, Explosives, Hemant Gupta, Illegal Arms, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 121A, Judges, Offences Against the State, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment in Terror Conspiracy Case: Mohammad Irfan vs. State of Karnataka (2022) Date of the Judgment: 11 July 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 610 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Hemant Gupta, J., S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can mere association with a group planning terrorist acts lead to a conviction for waging war

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment in Terror Conspiracy Case: Mohammad Irfan vs. State of Karnataka (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court refers the issue of Commissioner’s power to extend assessment time to a larger bench: Commissioner of Sales Tax Odisha vs. Essel Mining

/ Audit Assessments, Judges, Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004, Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 with Section 42(6), Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sales Tax, Tax Assessment, Tax Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court refers the issue of Commissioner’s power to extend assessment time to a larger bench: Commissioner of Sales Tax Odisha vs. Essel Mining LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Commissioner of Sales Tax can extend the time for an Assessing Authority to complete an audit assessment after the initial six-month period has expired. CASE TYPE: Tax

Supreme Court refers the issue of Commissioner’s power to extend assessment time to a larger bench: Commissioner of Sales Tax Odisha vs. Essel Mining Read Post »

Supreme Court Overrules Rangaiah: Appointments to Public Posts Governed by Existing Rules (20 May 2022)

/ Conditions of Service, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 309, Constitutional Law with Article 310, Constitutional Law with Article 311, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Promotion, Recruitment Rules, S. Ravindra Bhat, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Overrules Rangaiah: Appointments to Public Posts Governed by Existing Rules (20 May 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether appointments to public posts that fell vacant before the amendment of service rules are governed by the old rules or the new rules. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. vs. Raj

Supreme Court Overrules Rangaiah: Appointments to Public Posts Governed by Existing Rules (20 May 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top