V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Sunil Khatri (2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Sunil Khatri (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if possession was not taken due to court orders. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Sunil Khatri (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority Wins Against Godfrey Phillips (I) Ltd. & Ors. (06 May 2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), V. Ramasubramanian

Delhi Development Authority vs. Godfrey Phillips (I) Ltd. & Ors.: Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Date of the Judgment: 06 May 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 3073 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 23418 of 2017) Judges: Hemant Gupta, J. and V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a subsequent purchaser of land claim that the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority Wins Against Godfrey Phillips (I) Ltd. & Ors. (06 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Administration vs. Pawan Kumar (2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Administration vs. Pawan Kumar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can claim lapse of acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and whether deposit of compensation in court amounts to payment. CASE

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Administration vs. Pawan Kumar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the status of residents in old age homes as licensees: Samarpan Varishtha Jan Parisar vs. Rajendra Prasad Agarwal (2022)

/ Civil Law, Hemant Gupta, Indian Easements Act, 1882, Indian Easements Act, 1882 with Section 52, Injunction, Judges, License, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court clarifies the status of residents in old age homes as licensees: Samarpan Varishtha Jan Parisar vs. Rajendra Prasad Agarwal (2022) Date of the Judgment: May 6, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 447 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J. and V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can residents of an old age home claim a right to stay there indefinitely?

Supreme Court clarifies the status of residents in old age homes as licensees: Samarpan Varishtha Jan Parisar vs. Rajendra Prasad Agarwal (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for preliminary issues in civil suits: Sathyanath vs. Sarojamani (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLI, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XX Rule 5, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Hemant Gupta, Judges, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for preliminary issues in civil suits: Sathyanath vs. Sarojamani (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Procedure for framing preliminary issues in civil suits CASE TYPE: Civil Procedure Case Name: Sathyanath & Anr. vs. Sarojamani [Judgment Date]: 6 May 2022 Date of the Judgment: 6 May 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 445 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J.,

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for preliminary issues in civil suits: Sathyanath vs. Sarojamani (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Bhag Singh vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Bhag Singh vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Bhag Singh vs. Union of India. [Judgment Date]: May 5, 2022 Date of the Judgment: May 5, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 428 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J.,

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Bhag Singh vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Regulations for Foreign Medical Graduates: Aravinth R.A. vs. Union of India (2 May 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Hemant Gupta, Judges, National Medical Commission Act, 2019, National Medical Commission Act, 2019 with Section 15(4), National Medical Commission Act, 2019 with Section 36(4), National Medical Commission Act, 2019 with Section 57, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Regulations for Foreign Medical Graduates: Aravinth R.A. vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of regulations governing foreign medical graduates seeking registration in India. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Regulatory Law Case Name: Aravinth R.A. vs. The Secretary to the Government of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & Ors. Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Regulations for Foreign Medical Graduates: Aravinth R.A. vs. Union of India (2 May 2022) Read Post »

Compulsory Rotatory Residential Internship for Foreign Medical Graduates: Supreme Court Clarifies Requirements (29 April 2022)

/ Eligibility Requirement for Taking Admission in an Undergraduate Medical Course in a Foreign Medical Institution Regulations, 2002, Eligibility Requirement for Taking Admission in an Undergraduate Medical Course in a Foreign Medical Institution Regulations, 2002 with Regulation 9, Hemant Gupta, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 with Section 13(4-A), Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 with Section 13(4-B), Judges, Screening Test Regulations, 2002, Screening Test Regulations, 2002 with Regulation 2(c), Screening Test Regulations, 2002 with Regulation 2(g), Screening Test Regulations, 2002 with Regulation 4(3), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court on Compulsory Rotatory Residential Internship for Foreign Medical Graduates Date of the Judgment: 29 April 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 2950-2951 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos. 2536-2537 of 2022) Judges: Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice V. Ramasubramanian. Can a medical graduate who completed their degree online, without physical clinical training,

Compulsory Rotatory Residential Internship for Foreign Medical Graduates: Supreme Court Clarifies Requirements (29 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Mining Lease, Dismisses Waqf Board’s Claim Over Dilapidated Structure (29 April 2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Mining Law, V. Ramasubramanian, Waqf Act, 1995, Waqf Law, Waqf Law with Section 3(r)

Supreme Court Upholds Mining Lease, Dismisses Waqf Board’s Claim Over Dilapidated Structure (29 April 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dilapidated structure on a mining lease area, claimed as a waqf, can prevent mining activities. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Waqf Law, Mining Law Case Name: Waqf Board, Rajasthan vs. Jindal Saw Limited & Ors. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds Mining Lease, Dismisses Waqf Board’s Claim Over Dilapidated Structure (29 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Stamp Duty on Assignment of Debt: Asset Reconstruction Co. vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (26 April 2022)

/ Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 with Article 20(a), Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 with Article 45(f), Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 with Section 9(a), Hemant Gupta, Judges, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 with Section 2(zd), Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 with Section 5(1)(b), Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 with Section 5(2), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty on Assignment Deeds with Power of Attorney Date of the Judgment: 26 April 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 3070 of 2022 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 34723 of 2016) Judges: Hemant Gupta, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a single document, an assignment agreement, be subjected to stamp duty twice,

Supreme Court settles Stamp Duty on Assignment of Debt: Asset Reconstruction Co. vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (26 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement with Partial Back Wages in Allahabad Bank Case (22 April 2022)

/ Back Wages, Disciplinary Proceedings, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Service Law, Service Law with Regulation 9 of the Allahabad Bank Officer Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement with Partial Back Wages in Allahabad Bank Case (22 April 2022) Date of the Judgment: 22 April 2022 Citation: (Not Available in Source) Judges: Indira Banerjee, J. and V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a bank employee, wrongfully dismissed, claim full back wages upon reinstatement? The Supreme Court of India recently examined this

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement with Partial Back Wages in Allahabad Bank Case (22 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Organizers Primarily Liable in Meerut Fire Tragedy: Sanjay Gupta & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 133, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 54, Fundamental Rights, Hemant Gupta, Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 with Rule 47A, Judges, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Holds Organizers Primarily Liable in Meerut Fire Tragedy: Sanjay Gupta & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: April 12, 2022 Citation: Sanjay Gupta & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh Through Its Chief Secretary & Ors. [2022 INSC 350] Judges: Justice Hemant Gupta, Justice V. Ramasubramanian Can organizers

Supreme Court Holds Organizers Primarily Liable in Meerut Fire Tragedy: Sanjay Gupta & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top