Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Transfers Custodial Death Case to CBI, Emphasizes Witness Protection: Hansura Bai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 15, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 711 Judges: Vikram Nath J., Sandeep Mehta J. When a person dies in police custody, who should investigate the matter to ensure justice? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in the case of Hansura Bai & Anr. vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh […]

Supreme Court Transfers Custodial Death Case to CBI, Emphasizes Witness Protection: Hansura Bai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of abuse of dominant position under the Competition Act, 2002: Competition Commission of India vs. Schott Glass India Pvt. Ltd. (2025) INSC 668 (13 May 2025)

Date of the Judgment: 13 May 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 668 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. Can a company with a large market share be penalized simply for being successful? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case concerning Schott Glass India Pvt. Ltd. The court clarified the

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of abuse of dominant position under the Competition Act, 2002: Competition Commission of India vs. Schott Glass India Pvt. Ltd. (2025) INSC 668 (13 May 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Pension Benefits for Absorbed Electricity Board Employees: Vijay Kumar Joshi vs. Akash Tripathi (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 13, 2025 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. Do employees of cooperative societies, after being absorbed into the Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board (MPSEB), qualify for pension benefits? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Vijay Kumar Joshi vs. Akash Tripathi.

Supreme Court Allows Pension Benefits for Absorbed Electricity Board Employees: Vijay Kumar Joshi vs. Akash Tripathi (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles dispute over apartment allotment and dues under MOFA: Jawala Real Estate vs. Haresh (2025) INSC 669 (13 May 2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 13 May 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 669 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. When a property developer fails to provide essential documents and violates court orders by alienating the originally allotted property, how should the dues be calculated when an alternate property is offered? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court settles dispute over apartment allotment and dues under MOFA: Jawala Real Estate vs. Haresh (2025) INSC 669 (13 May 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in rape and murder case due to flawed investigation: Ramkirat Munilal Goud vs. State of Maharashtra (2025) INSC 702 (May 07, 2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 07, 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 702 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Sanjay Karol, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. In a shocking turn of events, the Supreme Court of India has overturned the conviction of an accused in a rape and murder case, citing a “shabby and perfunctory investigation.” The case, Ramkirat

Supreme Court overturns conviction in rape and murder case due to flawed investigation: Ramkirat Munilal Goud vs. State of Maharashtra (2025) INSC 702 (May 07, 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revives Abetment to Suicide Charges: Harjinder Singh vs. State of Punjab (2025)

Date of the Judgment: May 06, 2025 The Supreme Court of India addressed the critical issue of whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the Trial Court’s order to summon an accused under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for abetment to suicide. This case, Harjinder Singh vs. The State

Supreme Court Revives Abetment to Suicide Charges: Harjinder Singh vs. State of Punjab (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in cheque bounce case, invoking Article 142: Rajendra Anant Varik vs. Govind B. Prabhugaonkar (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 06, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 633 Judges: Vikram Nath, J. and Sandeep Mehta, J. Can the Supreme Court use its powers to provide complete justice when an accused has already paid the cheque amount in a case involving Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act? The Supreme Court addressed

Supreme Court acquits accused in cheque bounce case, invoking Article 142: Rajendra Anant Varik vs. Govind B. Prabhugaonkar (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the process for resolving grievances of allottees in Faridabad housing project: Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association vs. Union of India (25 April 2025)

Date of the Judgment: 25 April 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 573 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. Can long-standing disputes over housing allotments be resolved fairly? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association vs. Union of India, focusing on a residential

Supreme Court clarifies the process for resolving grievances of allottees in Faridabad housing project: Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association vs. Union of India (25 April 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case: Shakuntla Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 25, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 581 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Sanjay Karol, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. When does the relentless torment for dowry cross the line into abetment of suicide? The Supreme Court of India recently examined this question in Shakuntla Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, a case

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case: Shakuntla Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order in property dispute: Rajendhiran vs. Muthaiammal (2025)

Date of the Judgment: April 15, 2025 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Can a High Court decision be overturned if it misinterprets evidence and disregards findings of lower courts? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case involving a property dispute. The court found that the High Court had

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order in property dispute: Rajendhiran vs. Muthaiammal (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Delay and Lack of Inducement: G.V. Adhimoolam & Ors. vs. The Inspector of Police & Anr. (2025)

Date of the Judgment: April 04, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 681 Judges: Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta Can a criminal case be pursued based on a stale claim of cheating where the initial investment was suggested by a close relative, and there’s a significant delay in reporting the alleged fraud? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Delay and Lack of Inducement: G.V. Adhimoolam & Ors. vs. The Inspector of Police & Anr. (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies sentencing under IPC and POCSO Act in father-daughter rape case: Gyanendra Singh vs. State of U.P. (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 07, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 335 Judges: Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta Can a person be sentenced under both the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for the same crime? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in

Supreme Court clarifies sentencing under IPC and POCSO Act in father-daughter rape case: Gyanendra Singh vs. State of U.P. (2025) Read Post »

Scroll to Top