Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Compensation, Consumer Dispute, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Deficiency in Service, Judges, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of adequate compensation for deficiency in service in a consumer dispute. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection. Case Name: ITC Limited vs. Aashna Roy. Judgment Date: 7th February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 7th February 2023. Citation: [Not Available in Source]. Judges: […]

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revisits Consumer Compensation in Haircut Mishap Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Consumer Compensation, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 23, Deficiency in Service, Judges, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Revisits Consumer Compensation in Haircut Mishap Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of adequate compensation for deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, specifically concerning claims for mental trauma, loss of income, and pain and suffering. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: ITC Limited vs. Aashna Roy [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Revisits Consumer Compensation in Haircut Mishap Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Property Dispute: Developer Group India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Surinder Singh Marwah (2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 339, Corporate Law, Judges, Liquidation, Vikram Nath, Winding Up

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Property Dispute: Developer Group India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Surinder Singh Marwah (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in restraining the alienation of properties of a third party in a winding-up petition of another company. CASE TYPE: Corporate Law, Insolvency, Real Estate Case Name: Developer Group India

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Property Dispute: Developer Group India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Surinder Singh Marwah (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal, Modifies Injunction in Property Dispute: Developer Group India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Surinder Singh Marwah (2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 339, Injunction, Judges, Property Dispute, Property Law, Vikram Nath, Winding Up

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal, Modifies Injunction in Property Dispute: Developer Group India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Surinder Singh Marwah (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a blanket injunction on all properties of a company is justified when the claim is for a smaller amount and the company is not directly related to the company under liquidation. CASE

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal, Modifies Injunction in Property Dispute: Developer Group India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Surinder Singh Marwah (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Self-Defense Case: Jasbir Singh vs. State of Punjab (2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Self-Defense Case: Jasbir Singh vs. State of Punjab (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appellant’s actions constituted murder or whether they were protected under the right to private defense. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Jasbir Singh vs. State of Punjab Judgment Date: 19 January 2023 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Self-Defense Case: Jasbir Singh vs. State of Punjab (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Flawed Identification: Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel vs. State (2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 162, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Test Identification Parade, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Flawed Identification: Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Admissibility of Test Identification Parade (TIP) evidence and the burden of proof in criminal cases. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel vs. State Represented by the Inspector of Police Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Flawed Identification: Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel vs. State (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Flawed Identification Parade: Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel vs. State (2023) INSC 522

/ B.R. Gavai, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Flawed Identification Parade: Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel vs. State (2023) INSC 522 Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 522 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Vikram Nath, J. Can a conviction be upheld when the primary evidence relies on a flawed identification parade

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Flawed Identification Parade: Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel vs. State (2023) INSC 522 Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Classification of All-in-One Desktop Computers under Central Excise Tariff Act: Hewlett Packard India vs. Commissioner of Customs (2023)

/ Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with Section 4, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with Section 4A, Classification of Goods, Customs and Excise Law, Judges, Portability, Surya Kant, Tariff Item 8471, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Classification of All-in-One Desktop Computers under Central Excise Tariff Act LEGAL ISSUE: Classification of Automatic Data Processing Machines (ADPs) under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. CASE TYPE: Customs and Excise Law Case Name: Hewlett Packard India Sales Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs (Import), Nhava Sheva Judgment Date: 17 January 2023

Supreme Court Clarifies Classification of All-in-One Desktop Computers under Central Excise Tariff Act: Hewlett Packard India vs. Commissioner of Customs (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Ram Pratap vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Burden of Proof, Circumstantial Evidence, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Ram Pratap vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction of an accused can be sustained solely on circumstantial evidence without establishing a complete chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Ram Pratap vs. State of

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Ram Pratap vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty on Court Auction Sales: Registrar of Assurances vs. ASL Vyapar (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 47A, Judges, Market Value, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Stamp Duty, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty on Court Auction Sales: Registrar of Assurances vs. ASL Vyapar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Registering Authority can assess market value of a property sold through court-monitored public auction for stamp duty purposes. CASE TYPE: Property Law, Stamp Duty Case Name: Registrar of Assurances & Anr. vs. ASL Vyapar Private

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty on Court Auction Sales: Registrar of Assurances vs. ASL Vyapar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for review petitions: Suresh G. Ramnani vs. Aurelia Ana De Piedade Miranda (2022) INSC 546

/ Aniruddha Bose, Bombay High Court Rules, Bombay High Court Rules with Chapter XXX Rule 3(1), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 47 Rule 5, G.S. Patel, Judges, Prithviraj K. Chavan, Review Petition, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for review petitions: Suresh G. Ramnani vs. Aurelia Ana De Piedade Miranda (2022) INSC 546 LEGAL ISSUE: Procedure for handling review petitions when the original judge is available. CASE TYPE: Civil Procedure Case Name: Suresh G. Ramnani vs. Aurelia Ana De Piedade Miranda @ Ariya Alvares (Dead Thr. Lrs) & Ors.

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for review petitions: Suresh G. Ramnani vs. Aurelia Ana De Piedade Miranda (2022) INSC 546 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the jurisdiction of Civil Courts and DRT in loan recovery cases: Bank of Rajasthan vs. VCK Shares (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 10, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 151, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 9, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 with Section 17, Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 with Section 18, Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 with Section 19, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Bank Loan Recovery Cases: Bank of Rajasthan vs. VCK Shares (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a borrower can file an independent suit against a bank in a civil court when the bank has already initiated recovery proceedings at the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT). CASE TYPE: Banking Law, Debt Recovery Case Name:

Supreme Court clarifies the jurisdiction of Civil Courts and DRT in loan recovery cases: Bank of Rajasthan vs. VCK Shares (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top