Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Coal Shortfall Under Power Purchase Agreements: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited vs. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited & Ors. (2023) INSC 208 (03 March 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Change in Law, Contract Law, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 63, Judges, Power Purchase Agreements, Tariff Determination, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Coal Shortfall Under Power Purchase Agreements Date of the Judgment: 03 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 208 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., Vikram Nath, J. Can power generating companies claim compensation for a shortfall in coal supply, and if so, how should this compensation be calculated? The Supreme Court of India […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Coal Shortfall Under Power Purchase Agreements: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited vs. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited & Ors. (2023) INSC 208 (03 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction, Reduces Sentence Based on Juvenility Claim: Karan @ Fatiya vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376, Judges, Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 with Section 18, Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 with Section 9, Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 with Section 94, Offences Against Human Body, Sanjay Karol, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction, Reduces Sentence Based on Juvenility Claim: Karan @ Fatiya vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a claim of juvenility can be raised at any stage of the proceedings, even after final disposal of the case, and what is the effect on the sentence awarded if the accused is

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction, Reduces Sentence Based on Juvenility Claim: Karan @ Fatiya vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction, Reduces Sentence for Juvenile Offender in Heinous Crime Case

/ B.R. Gavai, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 with Section 18, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 with Section 9, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 with Section 94, Offences Against Human Body, Sanjay Karol, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction, Reduces Sentence for Juvenile Offender in Heinous Crime Case LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of juvenility and its impact on sentencing in cases involving heinous offenses. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Juvenile Justice. Case Name: Karan @ Fatiya vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh. [Judgment Date]: March 3, 2023 Date of the Judgment: March

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction, Reduces Sentence for Juvenile Offender in Heinous Crime Case Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence: Indrajit Das vs. State of Tripura (28 February 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Circumstantial Evidence, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence: Indrajit Das vs. State of Tripura (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prosecution successfully proved the guilt of the accused in a case based on circumstantial evidence where key links are missing. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Indrajit Das vs. The State of

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence: Indrajit Das vs. State of Tripura (28 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Accident Victims with Severe Disabilities: Chaus Taushif Alimiya vs. Memon Mahmmad Umar (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Disability Compensation, Judges, Motor Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Accident Victims with Severe Disabilities: Chaus Taushif Alimiya vs. Memon Mahmmad Umar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of just compensation in motor accident claims for victims with severe disabilities. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Chaus Taushif Alimiya ETC. vs. Memon Mahmmad Umar Anvarbhai & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 16 February

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Accident Victims with Severe Disabilities: Chaus Taushif Alimiya vs. Memon Mahmmad Umar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Accident Victims with Severe Disabilities: Chaus Taushif Alimiya vs. Memon Mahmmad Umar Anvarbhai & Ors. (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, Motor Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Accident Victims | Chaus Taushif Alimiya vs. Memon Mahmmad Umar Anvarbhai & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of just compensation in motor accident claims involving severe disabilities. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Chaus Taushif Alimiya ETC. vs. Memon Mahmmad Umar Anvarbhai & Ors. Judgment Date: 16 February 2023

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Accident Victims with Severe Disabilities: Chaus Taushif Alimiya vs. Memon Mahmmad Umar Anvarbhai & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Gruesome Family Murder Case: Ajai vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 307, B.R. Gavai, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Gruesome Family Murder Case: Ajai vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the testimony of a sole, injured eyewitness is sufficient for conviction in a murder case, and whether the High Court was correct in commuting the death penalty to life imprisonment. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Ajai

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Gruesome Family Murder Case: Ajai vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council’s Power to Set Pre-Enrollment Standards: Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi Law College (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Advocates Act, 1961, Advocates Act, 1961 with Section 24, Advocates Act, 1961 with Section 49, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Fundamental Rights, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Right to Practice, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council’s Power to Set Pre-Enrollment Standards: Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi Law College (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Bar Council of India can prescribe pre-enrollment training or examinations for advocates. CASE TYPE: Legal Profession Regulation Case Name: Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi Law College & Ors. Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council’s Power to Set Pre-Enrollment Standards: Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi Law College (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council’s Power to Set Pre-Enrolment Standards: Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi Law College (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Advocates Act, 1961, Advocates Act, 1961 with Section 24, Advocates Act, 1961 with Section 49, Advocates Act, 1961 with Section 7, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council’s Power to Set Pre-Enrolment Standards: Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi Law College (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Bar Council of India can prescribe pre-enrolment training or examinations for law graduates seeking to practice law. CASE TYPE: Legal Profession Regulation Case Name: Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi

Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council’s Power to Set Pre-Enrolment Standards: Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi Law College (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court to Reconsider Excommunication in Dawoodi Bohra Community: Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community vs. State of Maharashtra (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Bombay Protection of Excommunication Act, 1949, Bombay Protection of Excommunication Act, 1949 with Section 2(a), Bombay Protection of Excommunication Act, 1949 with Section 2(b), Bombay Protection of Excommunication Act, 1949 with Section 3, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 25, Constitutional Law with Article 26, Fundamental Rights, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court to Reconsider Excommunication in Dawoodi Bohra Community: Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Date of the Judgment: February 10, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 108 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J., Abhay S. Oka, J., Vikram Nath, J., and J.K. Maheshwari, J. Can a religious community’s practice

Supreme Court to Reconsider Excommunication in Dawoodi Bohra Community: Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court to Reconsider Excommunication in Dawoodi Bohra Community: Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community vs. State of Maharashtra (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 25, Constitutional Law with Article 26, Constitutional Morality, Freedom of Religion, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Religious Denominations, Religious Freedom, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court to Reconsider Excommunication in Dawoodi Bohra Community: Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) **Date of the Judgment:** February 10, 2023 **Citation:** 2023 INSC 1152 **Judges:** Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J., Abhay S. Oka, J., Vikram Nath, J., and J.K. Maheshwari, J. Can the practice of excommunication

Supreme Court to Reconsider Excommunication in Dawoodi Bohra Community: Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Compensation, Consumer Dispute, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Deficiency in Service, Judges, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of adequate compensation for deficiency in service in a consumer dispute. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection. Case Name: ITC Limited vs. Aashna Roy. Judgment Date: 7th February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 7th February 2023. Citation: [Not Available in Source]. Judges:

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top