Vikramajit Sen

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for allotment and development charges in Okhla Enclave Plot Dispute: Okhla Enclave Plot Holders’ Welfare Association vs. Union of India and Others (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration, Arbitration Process, Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 with Section 3, Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 with Section 5, Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 with Section 8(4), Judges, R. Banumathi, Special Committee, Vikramajit Sen

Supreme Court Clarifies Allotment and Development Charges in Okhla Enclave Dispute (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the process of allotment of plots, payment of development charges, and the role of the colonizer in a long-standing real estate dispute. CASE TYPE: Real Estate/Land Allotment Dispute Case Name: Okhla Enclave Plot Holders’ Welfare Association vs. Union of […]

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for allotment and development charges in Okhla Enclave Plot Dispute: Okhla Enclave Plot Holders’ Welfare Association vs. Union of India and Others (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Land Acquisition Quashing: TNHB vs. Saraswathy (2015)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Prafulla Chandra Pant, Vikramajit Sen

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the quashing of land acquisition proceedings at the instance of some landowners nullifies the entire acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Chairman & Managing Director, TNHB & Anr vs. S. Saraswathy & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 11th May 2015 Date of the Judgment: 11th May 2015 Citation: Not Available in the

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Land Acquisition Quashing: TNHB vs. Saraswathy (2015) Read Post »

Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court Upholds Physical Test Requirement in State of UP vs. Pankaj Kumar Vishnoi (25 July 2013)

/ Compassionate Appointment, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Dipak Misra, Judges, Physical Fitness Test, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 8(2), Vikramajit Sen

Date of the Judgment: 25 July 2013 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Dipak Misra, J., Vikramajit Sen, J. Can a person seeking compassionate appointment be exempted from a physical test? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the Uttar Pradesh Police Department. The court clarified that while compassionate appointments

Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court Upholds Physical Test Requirement in State of UP vs. Pankaj Kumar Vishnoi (25 July 2013) Read Post »

NEET Upheld: Supreme Court Decision on National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test for Medical Admissions (2013)

/ Altamas Kabir, Anil R. Dave, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 19(1)(g), Constitutional Law with Article 30, Education Law, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Medical Education, Regulation of Admissions, Vikramajit Sen

LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) for medical admissions. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Constitutional Law. Case Name: Christian Medical College Vellore & Ors vs. Union of India and Ors. Judgment Date: 18 July 2013 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 18 July 2013 Citation: Not Available Judges: Altamas Kabir, CJI and Vikramajit Sen,

NEET Upheld: Supreme Court Decision on National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test for Medical Admissions (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows broadcast of “Crime Patrol” episode related to JBT Teachers Scam: Vidya Dhar vs. Multi Screen Media (2013) INSC 376

/ Altamas Kabir, Anil R. Dave, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 389, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Judges, Vikramajit Sen

Date of the Judgment: 03 May 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 376 Judges: Altamas Kabir, C.J.I., Anil R. Dave, J., Vikramajit Sen, J. Can a television show broadcast a dramatized version of a case when an appeal is pending? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a television show based on

Supreme Court allows broadcast of “Crime Patrol” episode related to JBT Teachers Scam: Vidya Dhar vs. Multi Screen Media (2013) INSC 376 Read Post »

Scroll to Top