Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Inconsistent Dying Declarations: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Shabana Bi (2018) INSC 724 (29 August 2018)

/ Benefit of Doubt, Criminal Law, Dying Declaration, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Murder, R. Banumathi, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Inconsistent Dying Declarations Date of the Judgment: 29 August 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 724 Judges: R. Banumathi, J. and Vineet Saran, J. Can inconsistencies in dying declarations lead to the acquittal of an accused in a murder case? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this […]

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Inconsistent Dying Declarations: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Shabana Bi (2018) INSC 724 (29 August 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court modifies conviction in double murder case: Manphool Singh & Ors. vs. State of Haryana (2018)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, R. Banumathi, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court modifies conviction in double murder case: Manphool Singh & Ors. vs. State of Haryana (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused acted in self-defense and if the prosecution failed to explain the injuries on the accused. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Manphool Singh & Ors. vs. State of Haryana Judgment Date: 16 August 2018

Supreme Court modifies conviction in double murder case: Manphool Singh & Ors. vs. State of Haryana (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: State of Karnataka vs. P. Ravikumar (2018)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 164, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, R. Banumathi, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: State of Karnataka vs. P. Ravikumar (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in acquitting the accused based on the lack of substantial evidence and weakness of extra-judicial confessions. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: State of Karnataka vs. P. Ravikumar

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: State of Karnataka vs. P. Ravikumar (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in alleged strangulation case: State of Karnataka vs. Srinivasa (2018)

/ Benefit of Doubt, Evidence Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Medical Evidence, Offences Against Human Body, R. Banumathi, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court acquits accused in alleged strangulation case: State of Karnataka vs. Srinivasa (2018) Date of the Judgment: 14th August, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 723 Judges: R. Banumathi, J., Vineet Saran, J. Can a conviction for murder be overturned if medical evidence suggests the possibility of suicide? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court acquits accused in alleged strangulation case: State of Karnataka vs. Srinivasa (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case: Siddaling vs. State (2018)

/ Abetment of Suicide, Criminal Law, Dowry Harassment, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 306, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, R. Banumathi, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case: Siddaling vs. State (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the husband’s illicit relationship with another woman constitutes abetment to suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). CASE TYPE: Criminal Law (Abetment of Suicide, Dowry Harassment) Case Name: Siddaling vs. The State, Through

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case: Siddaling vs. State (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top