Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Drug Price Control: T.C. Healthcare vs. Union of India (2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995, Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 with Para 7, Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 with Para 9(1), Judges, Price Fixation, S. Ravindra Bhat, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Drug Price Control: T.C. Healthcare vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the price of drug formulations using sustained or continuous release technology can be fixed under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO) when specific price norms for such technologies are not explicitly mentioned in the DPCO. CASE TYPE: Drug […]

Supreme Court Upholds Drug Price Control: T.C. Healthcare vs. Union of India (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Rights in Insolvency Cases: MCGM vs. Abhilash Lal (2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 238, Judges, Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 with Section 92, Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 with Section 92A, S. Ravindra Bhat, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Rights in Insolvency Cases: MCGM vs. Abhilash Lal (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) overrides the statutory rights of a municipal corporation to control its properties. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) vs. Abhilash Lal & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 15

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Rights in Insolvency Cases: MCGM vs. Abhilash Lal (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies appeal process in Central Excise cases: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s. Krishna Wax (P) Ltd. (2019)

/ Adjudication Process, Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 11A, Judges, Show Cause Notice, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court clarifies appeal process in Central Excise cases: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s. Krishna Wax (P) Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an internal order of the Central Excise Department, determining that it has jurisdiction to proceed with a matter, is appealable before the issuance of a show cause notice. CASE TYPE: Central Excise

Supreme Court clarifies appeal process in Central Excise cases: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s. Krishna Wax (P) Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Inter-State River Water Dispute: Supreme Court Addresses Tamil Nadu’s Plea Against Karnataka’s Dam Construction (2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 131, Constitutional Law with Article 262, Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Addresses Inter-State River Water Dispute: Tamil Nadu vs. Karnataka (2019) Date of the Judgment: November 14, 2019 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Vineet Saran, J. Can a state unilaterally construct a dam on an inter-state river without the consent of the lower riparian state? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical

Inter-State River Water Dispute: Supreme Court Addresses Tamil Nadu’s Plea Against Karnataka’s Dam Construction (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Act: Indore Development Authority vs. Manohar Lal (2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24, S. Ravindra Bhat, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Act: Indore Development Authority vs. Manohar Lal (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Indore Development Authority vs. Manohar Lal & Ors. Judgment Date: 23 October 2019 Introduction

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Act: Indore Development Authority vs. Manohar Lal (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Lessor’s Right to Forfeit Lease in Liquidation Case: Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund vs. West Bengal Small Ind. Development Corporation Ltd. (21 October 2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Company Law, Company Law with Section 535, Judges, Lease Agreements, Liquidation, Mortgage Rights, Property Law, S. Ravindra Bhat, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Lessor’s Right to Forfeit Lease in Liquidation Case: Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund vs. West Bengal Small Ind. Development Corporation Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a mortgagee of leasehold rights can claim superior rights over the lessor when the lease has been validly terminated due to the lessee’s breach of lease conditions. CASE

Supreme Court Upholds Lessor’s Right to Forfeit Lease in Liquidation Case: Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund vs. West Bengal Small Ind. Development Corporation Ltd. (21 October 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Limitation for Revocation of Letters of Administration: Ramesh Nivrutti Bhagwat vs. Dr. Surendra Manohar Parakhe (2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Indian Succession Act, 1925, Indian Succession Act, 1925 with Section 228, Indian Succession Act, 1925 with Section 263, Indian Succession Act, 1925 with Section 276, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 137, S. Ravindra Bhat, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Sets Limitation for Revocation of Letters of Administration: Ramesh Nivrutti Bhagwat vs. Dr. Surendra Manohar Parakhe (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the limitation period for filing an application for revocation of letters of administration. CASE TYPE: Succession Law Case Name: Ramesh Nivrutti Bhagwat vs. Dr. Surendra Manohar Parakhe [Judgment Date]: October 4, 2019

Supreme Court Sets Limitation for Revocation of Letters of Administration: Ramesh Nivrutti Bhagwat vs. Dr. Surendra Manohar Parakhe (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Disputant’s Claim to Plot No. 2 in Housing Society Dispute: Shivkishan vs. Sujata Tarachand Makhija (27 September 2019)

/ Cooperative Society Law, Judges, Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 with Section 22, Membership Disputes in Cooperative Societies, Plot Allotment in Cooperative Societies, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Disputant’s Claim to Plot No. 2 in Housing Society Dispute: Shivkishan vs. Sujata Tarachand Makhija (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: The case addresses the rights of a member of a cooperative housing society concerning plot allotment, particularly when there’s a dispute over seniority and the legality of the allotment process. CASE TYPE: Cooperative Society

Supreme Court Upholds Disputant’s Claim to Plot No. 2 in Housing Society Dispute: Shivkishan vs. Sujata Tarachand Makhija (27 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Customs Valuation: Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs (27 September 2019)

/ Customs Act, 1962, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 112, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 114AA, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 18, Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Customs Tariff Act, 1975 with Section XVI, Customs Tariff Act, 1975 with Tariff Item 8525, Customs Tariff Act, 1975 with Tariff Item 8543, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Customs Valuation: Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs (27 September 2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the value of embedded software and related services should be included in the assessable value of imported goods, and whether imported goods should be classified as individual items or as a complete unit based on

Supreme Court Upholds Customs Valuation: Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs (27 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act in cheque bounce cases: G.J. Raja vs. Tejraj Surana (30 July 2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 357, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 421, Judges, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 143A, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 148, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Rules Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act is Prospective | G.J. Raja vs. Tejraj Surana Date of the Judgment: 30 July 2019 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 1160 of 2019 @ SLP(Crl.)No.3342 of 2019 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Vineet Saran, J. Can an amendment to a law apply to cases that occurred

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act in cheque bounce cases: G.J. Raja vs. Tejraj Surana (30 July 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Refund for Delayed Villa: Marvel Omega Builders vs. Shrihari Gokhale (2019)

/ Breach of contract, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 23, Consumer Rights, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clauses 5(a) and (b), Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Orders Refund for Delayed Villa: Marvel Omega Builders vs. Shrihari Gokhale (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a consumer is entitled to a refund with interest for a delayed real estate project. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Marvel Omega Builders Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. vs. Shrihari Gokhale and Anr. [Judgment Date]: July 30, 2019

Supreme Court Orders Refund for Delayed Villa: Marvel Omega Builders vs. Shrihari Gokhale (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Union Election Based on Constitution: Karbhari vs. Deepak (2019)

/ Judges, Labour Law, Trade Union Dispute, Trade Union Elections, Trade Unions Act, 1926, Trade Unions Act, 1926 with Constitution of the Sabha, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Union Election Based on Constitution: Karbhari vs. Deepak (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a trade union’s election process can include stipulations not explicitly mentioned in its constitution. CASE TYPE: Labour Law/Trade Union Dispute Case Name: Karbhari and others Vs. Deepak V. Chengede and others Judgment Date: 30 July 2019 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Upholds Union Election Based on Constitution: Karbhari vs. Deepak (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top