Judicial Appointments

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification of District Judge Candidate Due to Pending Criminal Case: Anil Bhardwaj vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh (2020)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Character Verification, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 406, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Judicial Appointments, M.R. Shah, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification of District Judge Candidate Due to Pending Criminal Case: Anil Bhardwaj vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a candidate can be denied appointment to the post of District Judge due to a pending criminal case, despite being on the select list and subsequently acquitted. CASE TYPE: Service […]

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification of District Judge Candidate Due to Pending Criminal Case: Anil Bhardwaj vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies absorption criteria for Ad-hoc Fast Track Court Judges: High Court of Hyderabad vs. P. Murali Mohana Reddy (2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Absorption of Ad-hoc Judges, Andhra Pradesh Judicial Services Rules, 2007, Andhra Pradesh Judicial Services Rules, 2007 with Rule 6, Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India, Judges, Judicial Appointments, S. Abdul Nazeer, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies absorption criteria for Ad-hoc Fast Track Court Judges: High Court of Hyderabad vs. P. Murali Mohana Reddy (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether minimum qualifying marks are required in the viva voce (interview) for absorption of ad-hoc Fast Track Court Judges into the regular cadre. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: High Court of

Supreme Court clarifies absorption criteria for Ad-hoc Fast Track Court Judges: High Court of Hyderabad vs. P. Murali Mohana Reddy (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Delhi Judicial Service Exam Criteria: Taniya Malik vs. High Court of Delhi (2018)

/ Amitava Roy, Arun Mishra, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Judges, Judicial Appointments, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Delhi Judicial Service Exam Criteria: Taniya Malik vs. High Court of Delhi (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court’s criteria for the Delhi Judicial Service Examination, including minimum cut-off marks and the absence of re-evaluation, were valid. CASE TYPE: Service Law (Judicial Appointments) Case Name: Taniya Malik vs. The Registrar General of

Supreme Court Upholds Delhi Judicial Service Exam Criteria: Taniya Malik vs. High Court of Delhi (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top