Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 with Section 20

Supreme Court directs Sessions Court to verify juvenility claim of convict: Vinod Katara vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (12 September 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 39, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Juvenile Justice Act, Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 with Section 20, Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 with Section 7A, Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 with Section 94, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court directs Sessions Court to verify juvenility claim of convict: Vinod Katara vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a claim of juvenility can be raised at any stage of a legal proceeding, even after the final disposal of the case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Vinod Katara vs. State of Uttar […]

Supreme Court directs Sessions Court to verify juvenility claim of convict: Vinod Katara vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (12 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules on juvenility of accused in a 1981 murder case: Satya Deo vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Juvenile in Conflict with Law, Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 with Section 2(l), Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 with Section 20, Offences Against Human Body, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court rules on juvenility of accused in a 1981 murder case: Satya Deo vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) Date of the Judgment: October 7, 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 777 Judges: S. Abdul Nazeer, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J. Can an individual, convicted of a crime committed as a minor under the Juvenile Justice Act,

Supreme Court rules on juvenility of accused in a 1981 murder case: Satya Deo vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top