Juvenile Justice Act with Section 20

Supreme Court reduces murder conviction to culpable homicide in agricultural land dispute: Sita Ram & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan (2021)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 300, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, Juvenile Justice Act, Juvenile Justice Act with Section 20, Juvenile Justice Act with Section 25, Juvenile Offenders, Offences Against Human Body, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide: Sita Ram vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the act of causing death in a sudden fight without premeditation amounts to murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Sita Ram & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan [Judgment Date]: […]

Supreme Court reduces murder conviction to culpable homicide in agricultural land dispute: Sita Ram & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Decides Juvenile Status Under the JJ Act: Ketankumar Gopalbhai Tandel vs. State of Gujarat (2013)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 324, Judges, Juvenile Justice Act, Juvenile Justice Act with Section 2(k), Juvenile Justice Act with Section 20, Juvenile Justice Act with Section 49, K.S. Radhakrishnan, Pinaki Chandra Ghose

Date of the Judgment: July 18, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 521 Judges: K.S. Radhakrishnan, J., Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. Can a person who was not considered a juvenile under the old law, be considered a juvenile under the new law? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case where the accused was a few

Supreme Court Decides Juvenile Status Under the JJ Act: Ketankumar Gopalbhai Tandel vs. State of Gujarat (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top