Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 with Section 70

Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit under Karnataka VAT Act: State of Karnataka vs. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited (2023) INSC 208 (13 March 2023)

/ Burden of Proof, C.T. Ravikumar, Input Tax Credit, Judges, Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 with Section 70, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Input Tax Credit Claims Under Karnataka VAT Act Date of the Judgment: 13 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 208 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a purchasing dealer claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) merely by producing invoices and payment records, or is there a higher burden of proof? The […]

Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit under Karnataka VAT Act: State of Karnataka vs. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited (2023) INSC 208 (13 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit under Karnataka VAT Act: State of Karnataka vs. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited (2023) INSC 212 (13 March 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Input Tax Credit, Judges, Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 with Section 70, M.R. Shah

Karnataka VAT Act: Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit Date of the Judgment: 13 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 212 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a purchasing dealer claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) merely by producing invoices and payment receipts, or is there a higher burden of

Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit under Karnataka VAT Act: State of Karnataka vs. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited (2023) INSC 212 (13 March 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top