Labour Law

Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Dues to Sugar Factory Employees: Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babulal Lade & Ors. (24 March 2023)

/ Civil Procedure, Court Directions, Employee Dues, Execution of Orders, Judges, Krishna Murari, Labour Law, M.R. Shah, Wages and Salaries

Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Dues to Sugar Factory Employees: Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babulal Lade & Ors. (2023) Date of the Judgment: 24 March 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can long-pending dues of employees be finally settled? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question […]

Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Dues to Sugar Factory Employees: Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babulal Lade & Ors. (24 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Labour Court Award Due to Workman’s Failure to Report for Duty: Creative Garments Ltd. vs. Kashiram Verma (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order VI Rule 14A, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, Labour Law, Payment of Wages Act, 1936, Rajesh Bindal, Workman Compensation Act, 1923

Supreme Court Sets Aside Labour Court Award Due to Workman’s Failure to Report for Duty: Creative Garments Ltd. vs. Kashiram Verma (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Labour Court’s award of reinstatement with back wages is valid when the workman fails to report for duty despite multiple opportunities and court orders. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case

Supreme Court Sets Aside Labour Court Award Due to Workman’s Failure to Report for Duty: Creative Garments Ltd. vs. Kashiram Verma (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, B.R. Gavai, Bela M. Trivedi, Compassionate Appointment, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 18(3), Labour Law with Section 2(p), M.R. Shah, Pankaj Mithal, R. Banumathi, Sandeep Mehta, Service Law, T.S. Thakur

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 February 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M. Trivedi When a person dies while in service, can their dependent automatically get a job? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on regularization of contractual employee: Zila Parishad vs. Santosh Tukaram Tiware (2022)

/ Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 14, Contractual Employment, Judges, M. R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh, Regularization of Service, Service Law, Termination of Employment

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on regularization of contractual employee: Zila Parishad vs. Santosh Tukaram Tiware (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractual employee is entitled to regularization of service due to long service. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Thane & Ors. vs. Santosh Tukaram Tiware & Ors. Judgment

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on regularization of contractual employee: Zila Parishad vs. Santosh Tukaram Tiware (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Petitions Challenging Bonus Act Amendment: Union of India vs. United Planters Association (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Judicial Review, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 2(13), Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Petitions Challenging Bonus Act Amendment: Union of India vs. United Planters Association (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015 should be transferred to the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Labour Law Case Name: Union of India vs. The

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Petitions Challenging Bonus Act Amendment: Union of India vs. United Planters Association (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reinstates Contractual Employee: K. Ragupathi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Contractual Employment, Gautam Budh University Act, 2002, Gautam Budh University Act, 2002 with Section 29(1), Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Principles of Natural Justice, Service Law, Termination of Service

Supreme Court Reinstates Contractual Employee: K. Ragupathi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: May 12, 2022 Citation: K. Ragupathi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) INSC 489 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and B.R. Gavai, J. Can a university terminate a contractual employee without following principles of natural justice, even if

Supreme Court Reinstates Contractual Employee: K. Ragupathi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Arbitration Dispute: M/s. Kelkar & Kelkar vs. M/s. Hotel Pride Executive Pvt. Ltd. (2022)

/ Arbitration Act, 1940, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Appeal, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, M. R. Shah, Statutory Remedies

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Arbitration Dispute: M/s. Kelkar & Kelkar vs. M/s. Hotel Pride Executive Pvt. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can entertain a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India against an arbitral award when a statutory remedy of appeal is available under the

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Arbitration Dispute: M/s. Kelkar & Kelkar vs. M/s. Hotel Pride Executive Pvt. Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Resolves Long-Standing Dispute on Absorption of Temporary LIC Workers (27 April 2022)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 18, Judges, Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956, Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 with Section 48, Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 with Section 49, Surya Kant, Unfair Labour Practices, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Resolves Long-Standing Dispute on Absorption of Temporary LIC Workers (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Absorption of temporary, badli, and part-time workers. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Ranbir Singh vs. SK Roy, Chairman, Life Insurance Corp. of India & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 27 April 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 27 April 2022 The Supreme

Supreme Court Resolves Long-Standing Dispute on Absorption of Temporary LIC Workers (27 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Ad-hoc Employee Rights: Manish Gupta & Anr. vs. President, Jan Bhagidari Samiti & Ors. (21 April 2022)

/ Ad-hoc Appointments, B.R. Gavai, Contractual Employees, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Ad-hoc Employee Rights: Manish Gupta & Anr. vs. President, Jan Bhagidari Samiti & Ors. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether ad-hoc employees can be replaced by other ad-hoc employees or if they can only be replaced by regularly appointed candidates. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Manish Gupta & Anr. vs. President, Jan Bhagidari

Supreme Court Upholds Ad-hoc Employee Rights: Manish Gupta & Anr. vs. President, Jan Bhagidari Samiti & Ors. (21 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Auto Driver’s Death Due to Cardiac Arrest: C. Manjamma vs. The Divisional Manager (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Dinesh Maheshwari, Employees Compensation Act, 1933, Employees Compensation Act, 1933 with Section 30, Judges, Labour Law, Workmen Compensation

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Auto Driver’s Death Due to Cardiac Arrest: C. Manjamma vs. The Divisional Manager (2022) Date of the Judgment: March 29, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 256 Judges: Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Aniruddha Bose Can a sudden cardiac arrest during work be considered an employment-related injury, entitling the family to compensation?

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Auto Driver’s Death Due to Cardiac Arrest: C. Manjamma vs. The Divisional Manager (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on regularization of contractual employees: State of Gujarat vs. R.J. Pathan (24 March 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contractual Employees, Judges, M.R. Shah, Regularization, Service Law

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on regularization of contractual employees: State of Gujarat vs. R.J. Pathan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether contractual employees working on a project basis can claim regularization based on the length of their service, especially when their employment was initially for a fixed term and in a temporary project. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on regularization of contractual employees: State of Gujarat vs. R.J. Pathan (24 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation Under Employee’s Compensation Act: Shobha vs. Vithalrao Shinde (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Compensation Payment, Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 with Section 4A, Interest on Compensation, Judges, Labour Law, Labour Rights, M.R. Shah, Workplace Accidents

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation Under Employee’s Compensation Act: Shobha vs. Vithalrao Shinde (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of interest on compensation under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Shobha & Ors. vs. The Chairman, Vithalrao Shinde Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 11, 2022 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation Under Employee’s Compensation Act: Shobha vs. Vithalrao Shinde (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top