Labour Law

Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Dues to Sugar Factory Employees: Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babulal Lade & Ors. (24 March 2023)

/ Civil Procedure, Court Directions, Employee Dues, Execution of Orders, Judges, Krishna Murari, Labour Law, M.R. Shah, Wages and Salaries

Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Dues to Sugar Factory Employees: Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babulal Lade & Ors. (2023) Date of the Judgment: 24 March 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can long-pending dues of employees be finally settled? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question […]

Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Dues to Sugar Factory Employees: Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babulal Lade & Ors. (24 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Labour Court Award Due to Workman’s Failure to Report for Duty: Creative Garments Ltd. vs. Kashiram Verma (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order VI Rule 14A, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, Labour Law, Payment of Wages Act, 1936, Rajesh Bindal, Workman Compensation Act, 1923

Supreme Court Sets Aside Labour Court Award Due to Workman’s Failure to Report for Duty: Creative Garments Ltd. vs. Kashiram Verma (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Labour Court’s award of reinstatement with back wages is valid when the workman fails to report for duty despite multiple opportunities and court orders. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case

Supreme Court Sets Aside Labour Court Award Due to Workman’s Failure to Report for Duty: Creative Garments Ltd. vs. Kashiram Verma (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, B.R. Gavai, Bela M. Trivedi, Compassionate Appointment, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 18(3), Labour Law with Section 2(p), M.R. Shah, Pankaj Mithal, R. Banumathi, Sandeep Mehta, Service Law, T.S. Thakur

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 February 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M. Trivedi When a person dies while in service, can their dependent automatically get a job? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Petitions Challenging Bonus Act Amendment: Union of India vs. United Planters Association (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Judicial Review, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 2(13), Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Petitions Challenging Bonus Act Amendment: Union of India vs. United Planters Association (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015 should be transferred to the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Labour Law Case Name: Union of India vs. The

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Petitions Challenging Bonus Act Amendment: Union of India vs. United Planters Association (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Auto Driver’s Death Due to Cardiac Arrest: C. Manjamma vs. The Divisional Manager (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Dinesh Maheshwari, Employees Compensation Act, 1933, Employees Compensation Act, 1933 with Section 30, Judges, Labour Law, Workmen Compensation

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Auto Driver’s Death Due to Cardiac Arrest: C. Manjamma vs. The Divisional Manager (2022) Date of the Judgment: March 29, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 256 Judges: Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Aniruddha Bose Can a sudden cardiac arrest during work be considered an employment-related injury, entitling the family to compensation?

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Auto Driver’s Death Due to Cardiac Arrest: C. Manjamma vs. The Divisional Manager (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation Under Employee’s Compensation Act: Shobha vs. Vithalrao Shinde (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Compensation Payment, Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 with Section 4A, Interest on Compensation, Judges, Labour Law, Labour Rights, M.R. Shah, Workplace Accidents

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation Under Employee’s Compensation Act: Shobha vs. Vithalrao Shinde (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of interest on compensation under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Shobha & Ors. vs. The Chairman, Vithalrao Shinde Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 11, 2022 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation Under Employee’s Compensation Act: Shobha vs. Vithalrao Shinde (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Contractual Employment, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(oo)(bb), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-F, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-G, Judges, Labour Law, M.R. Shah, Unfair Labour Practices

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractual employee is entitled to reinstatement and back wages upon termination, or if a lump sum compensation is more appropriate. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Kalawati Pandurang

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in MSRTC Accident Case: Dilip Uttam Jayabhay vs. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (03 January 2022)

/ B. V. Nagarathna, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 279, Judges, Labour Law, M. R. Shah, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, Unfair Labour Practices

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in MSRTC Accident Case: Dilip Uttam Jayabhay vs. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Industrial Court was justified in interfering with the order of dismissal of a driver involved in a fatal accident, and whether the punishment of dismissal was disproportionate to the misconduct proved. CASE TYPE: Labour

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in MSRTC Accident Case: Dilip Uttam Jayabhay vs. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (03 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns reinstatement order in MSRTC driver dismissal case: Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Dilip Uttam Jayabhay (2022) INSC 5 (03 January 2022)

/ B. V. Nagarathna, Criminal Law, Criminal Law with Section 279, Disciplinary Proceedings, Dismissal from Service, Industrial Disputes, Judges, Labour Law, M. R. Shah, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 with Section 1(g), Schedule IV, Reinstatement, Service Law, Unfair Labour Practices

Supreme Court overturns reinstatement order in MSRTC driver dismissal case Date of the Judgment: 03 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 5 Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and B. V. Nagarathna, J. Can an Industrial Court interfere with a disciplinary authority’s decision to dismiss an employee, especially when the employee’s misconduct led to a fatal accident?

Supreme Court overturns reinstatement order in MSRTC driver dismissal case: Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Dilip Uttam Jayabhay (2022) INSC 5 (03 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Conductor for Misconduct: UP Road Transport Corp vs. Gajadhar Nath (2021)

/ Applicability of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Domestic Inquiry, Hemant Gupta, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 11A, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Conductor for Misconduct: UP Road Transport Corp vs. Gajadhar Nath (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a disciplinary authority can rely on the statement of an inspector to prove misconduct of a bus conductor even without examining passengers who were allegedly traveling without tickets. CASE TYPE: Labour Law/ Industrial Dispute Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Conductor for Misconduct: UP Road Transport Corp vs. Gajadhar Nath (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Orders, Modifies Interest Rate in Zilla Parishad Case (30 November 2021)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Civil Procedure, Judges, Labour Court, Labour Law, Review of Labour Court Orders, Review Petition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Orders, Modifies Interest Rate in Zilla Parishad Case (2021) Date of the Judgment: 30 November 2021 Citation: (Not Available in the provided document) Judges: Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice Ajay Rastogi. Can a higher court interfere with the orders passed by the Labour Court and the High Court? The

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Orders, Modifies Interest Rate in Zilla Parishad Case (30 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Voluntary Retirement Acceptance Despite Employee’s Withdrawal Attempt: New Victoria Mills vs. Shrikant Arya (2021)

/ Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25(o), Judges, Labour Law, M.M. Sundresh, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Voluntary Retirement Scheme

Supreme Court Upholds Voluntary Retirement Acceptance Despite Employee’s Withdrawal Attempt: New Victoria Mills vs. Shrikant Arya (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee can withdraw their voluntary retirement application after it has been accepted by the employer but before the effective date of retirement, especially when the employer postpones the relieving date. CASE TYPE: Labour Law/Service

Supreme Court Upholds Voluntary Retirement Acceptance Despite Employee’s Withdrawal Attempt: New Victoria Mills vs. Shrikant Arya (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top