Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11

Supreme Court shifts land acquisition date for fair compensation: Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz vs. Government of Karnataka (2025) INSC 3 (02 January 2025)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 300-A, Judges, K. V. Viswanathan, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 with Section 28, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 with Section 30, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11

Date of the Judgment: 02 January 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 3 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., K. V. Viswanathan, J. Can the government delay compensation for land acquisition for over two decades? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical issue in a case concerning the Bengaluru-Mysuru Infrastructure Corridor Project. The Court ruled that landowners […]

Supreme Court shifts land acquisition date for fair compensation: Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz vs. Government of Karnataka (2025) INSC 3 (02 January 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Compensation for Land Acquisition Delay: Loonkaran Gandhi vs. State of Maharashtra (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 48-A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 9, Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936, Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 with Section 39, Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 with Section 67, Right to Property

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Compensation for Land Acquisition Delay: Loonkaran Gandhi vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of compensation for land acquired under the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936, with significant delays. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Civil Law Case Name: Loonkaran Gandhi (D) Thr. Lr. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Compensation for Land Acquisition Delay: Loonkaran Gandhi vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Jagan Singh (2023)

/ Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Jagan Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding the lapse of land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs.

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Jagan Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition rights of subsequent purchasers: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 558 (18 May 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can invoke Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 to claim that the acquisition has lapsed. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition rights of subsequent purchasers: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 558 (18 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Ishwarbhai Patel (2023)

/ Consent Award, Deemed Lapse, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, M. R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Ishwarbhai Patel (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 17, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 239 Judges: M. R. Shah, J., Manoj Misra, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if the landowner refuses compensation after a consent award? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Ishwarbhai Patel (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Patel (2023)

/ Deemed Lapse of Acquisition, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M. R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Patel (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 17, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 253 Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and Manoj Misra, J. Can a land owner refuse compensation after a consent award and then claim the acquisition has lapsed? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Patel (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Lack Locus Standi in Land Acquisition Cases (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Lack Locus Standi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the right to challenge land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr. vs. M/s. Beads Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 13, 2023 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Lack Locus Standi in Land Acquisition Cases (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. B.S. Dhillon (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. B.S. Dhillon (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 13, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 226 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities have not taken possession

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. B.S. Dhillon (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation at Rs. 1,000 Per Square Yard in Land Acquisition Case: Radhey Sham vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation at Rs. 1,000 Per Square Yard in Land Acquisition Case: Radhey Sham vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Radhey Sham vs. The State of Haryana and Others [Judgment Date]: October

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation at Rs. 1,000 Per Square Yard in Land Acquisition Case: Radhey Sham vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition compensation when awards are delayed by court orders: Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority vs. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey & Ors. (2022) INSC 518 (20 May 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 48(1), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Compensation When Awards are Delayed by Court Orders LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 when awards under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 are delayed due to court orders. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition compensation when awards are delayed by court orders: Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority vs. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey & Ors. (2022) INSC 518 (20 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23(1)(A)

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in reducing the additional compensation awarded by the Reference Court in land acquisition cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Ambalal Babulal Patel ETC. ETC. vs. The Group General Manager, ONGC &

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in reducing the additional compensation awarded by the Reference Court in a land acquisition case. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Ambalal Babulal Patel ETC. ETC. vs. The Group General Manager, ONGC

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top