Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if either possession is taken or compensation is paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi […]
Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) Date of the Judgment: April 10, 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1987 of 2023 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6169 of 2023) (@ Diary No.37735 of 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T.
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, even if possession has been taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land acquisition lapse in Delhi: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the locus standi to challenge the acquisition of said land, and whether the acquisition proceedings are deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the
Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 13, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 229 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities could not take possession
Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. B.S. Dhillon (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 13, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 226 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities have not taken possession
Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation has not been paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name:
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Jai Prakash Tyagi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid, or vice-versa. CASE TYPE:
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, despite the government taking possession of the land. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr. vs. Subhash Chander Khatri & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 24
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishan Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE:
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land
