Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16(2)

Supreme Court clarifies the rights of Bangalore Development Authority in property disputes: Bangalore Development Authority vs. N. Nanjappa and another (2021) INSC 727 (06 December 2021)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 with Section 17, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 with Section 19, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 101, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 97, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16(2), M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights of Bangalore Development Authority in Property Disputes Date of the Judgment: 06 December 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 727 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a development authority’s claim to land acquired decades ago be ignored in a property dispute between private parties? The Supreme Court addressed this critical […]

Supreme Court clarifies the rights of Bangalore Development Authority in property disputes: Bangalore Development Authority vs. N. Nanjappa and another (2021) INSC 727 (06 December 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Re-Hearing of Land Acquisition Appeals: Mysore Urban Development Authority vs. K.M. Chikkathayamma (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Judges, Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987, Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 17(1), Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 18(3), Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 19(7), Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 12(2), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16(2), S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Orders Re-Hearing of Land Acquisition Appeals: Mysore Urban Development Authority vs. K.M. Chikkathayamma (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in dismissing the appeals filed by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) as withdrawn based on a resolution by MUDA. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Civil Case Name: Mysore Urban Development Authority

Supreme Court Orders Re-Hearing of Land Acquisition Appeals: Mysore Urban Development Authority vs. K.M. Chikkathayamma (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Finality to Land Acquisition: H.N. Jagannath vs. State of Karnataka (2017)

/ Arun Mishra, Bangalore Development Authority Act, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 9, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16(2), Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil court can decide on the validity of land acquisition notifications and proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: H. N. Jagannath & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. Judgment Date: 06 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 06 December 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 1049 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., Mohan

Supreme Court Restores Finality to Land Acquisition: H.N. Jagannath vs. State of Karnataka (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top