Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Omvir Singh (2022) – Land Acquisition

/ Hima Kohli, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Omvir Singh (2022) – Land Acquisition LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, considering delays and prior judgments. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Omvir Singh & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 15 December 2022 Date […]

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Omvir Singh (2022) – Land Acquisition Read Post »

Land Valuation Remanded: Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Land Acquisition Case – State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Radheshyam (24 November 2022)

/ Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Market Value Determination, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Fresh Valuation: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Radheshyam LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value and permissible deductions in land acquisition compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. vs. Radheshyam & Ors. Judgment Date: 24 November 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Land Valuation Remanded: Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Land Acquisition Case – State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Radheshyam (24 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Land Compensation: Land Acquisition Act Case (22 November 2022)

/ J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Land Compensation: Land Acquisition Act Case (22 November 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, including the validity of deductions for development charges. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Revenue Divisional Officer & Anr. vs. Ismail Bhai and Others Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Land Compensation: Land Acquisition Act Case (22 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Disbursement in Land Acquisition Cases: Kazi Moinuddin Kazi Bashiroddin vs. MTDC (2022)

/ Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Disbursement in Land Acquisition Cases: Kazi Moinuddin Kazi Bashiroddin vs. MTDC (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Supreme Court orders regarding disbursement of enhanced compensation in land acquisition cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Kazi Moinuddin Kazi Bashiroddin & Ors. vs. The Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 30

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Disbursement in Land Acquisition Cases: Kazi Moinuddin Kazi Bashiroddin vs. MTDC (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 66, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 90, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, Execution of Decrees, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, M.M. Sundresh, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an auction sale of property can be set aside due to procedural irregularities after multiple opportunities for objections were missed by the judgment debtor, and whether a bona fide auction purchaser’s rights are

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for Haryana Villages: Balwan Singh vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Fair Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for Haryana Villages LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Balwan Singh (Dead) By Lrs. Etc. Etc. vs. The State of Haryana and Others [Judgment Date]: 18 May 2022 Date of the Judgment: 18 May 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 486 Judges:

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for Haryana Villages: Balwan Singh vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Bhag Singh vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Bhag Singh vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Bhag Singh vs. Union of India. [Judgment Date]: May 5, 2022 Date of the Judgment: May 5, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 428 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J.,

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Bhag Singh vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances compensation for land acquisition in Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation case (19 April 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 with Section 32(2), Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 with Section 34

Supreme Court enhances compensation for land acquisition in Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation case Date of the Judgment: 19 April 2022 Citation: [Not Available in the provided text] Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. When land is acquired for industrial development, how should the compensation be calculated? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed

Supreme Court enhances compensation for land acquisition in Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation case (19 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Land Compensation: Union of India vs. Premlata (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Modifies Land Compensation: Union of India vs. Premlata (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition, specifically regarding the deduction for development charges. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Union of India vs. Premlata and Others Judgment Date: 06 April 2022 Date of the Judgment: 06 April 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC

Supreme Court Modifies Land Compensation: Union of India vs. Premlata (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Land Acquisition Case: Sanjay Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2022)

/ Additional Evidence, B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 27, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Land Acquisition Case: Sanjay Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) Date of the Judgment: March 10, 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can an appellate court allow additional evidence in a land acquisition case to ensure fair compensation? The Supreme Court addressed this question in

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Land Acquisition Case: Sanjay Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Proper Market Value Assessment: Pramina Devi vs. State of Jharkhand (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Market Value Assessment

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Proper Market Value Assessment: Pramina Devi vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of Fair Market Value in Land Acquisition Cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Pramina Devi (Dead) Thr. LRs. vs. State of Jharkhand. Judgment Date: 10 March 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Proper Market Value Assessment: Pramina Devi vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) vs. Yunus & Ors. (03 February 2022)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 28A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 20, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 21, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Clarifies: Lok Adalat Awards Cannot Trigger Land Compensation Redetermination Under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an award passed by a Lok Adalat under Section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 can be the basis for redetermination of compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act,

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) vs. Yunus & Ors. (03 February 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top