Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18

Supreme Court Relieves Landowners from Returning Excess Compensation in Haryana Land Acquisition Case (2021)

/ Compensation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Relieves Landowners from Returning Excess Compensation in Haryana Land Acquisition Case (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether landowners should be required to return excess compensation received due to prior court orders, when the final compensation is reduced. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Civil Case Name: Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Ors. vs. […]

Supreme Court Relieves Landowners from Returning Excess Compensation in Haryana Land Acquisition Case (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants parity in land acquisition compensation despite delay: Ningappa Thotappa Angadi vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2019)

/ B.R. Gavai, Compensation Law, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Parity in Compensation, S.A. Bobde, Surya Kant

Supreme Court grants parity in land acquisition compensation despite delay: Ningappa Thotappa Angadi vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land owner who did not appeal a High Court order in a timely manner can receive the same compensation as other land owners who did appeal promptly in the same land acquisition

Supreme Court grants parity in land acquisition compensation despite delay: Ningappa Thotappa Angadi vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Land Compensation in Maharashtra Land Acquisition Case: Namdeo Shankar Govardhane vs State of Maharashtra (2019) INSC 698 (17 July 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 54

Supreme Court Reduces Land Compensation in Maharashtra Land Acquisition Case Date of the Judgment: 17 July 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 698 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can the price of a small piece of land be the sole determinant for the compensation of a large land acquisition? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Reduces Land Compensation in Maharashtra Land Acquisition Case: Namdeo Shankar Govardhane vs State of Maharashtra (2019) INSC 698 (17 July 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revisits Land Acquisition Compensation: Executive Engineer vs. Vitthal Damodar Patil (2019)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4

Supreme Court Revisits Land Acquisition Compensation: Executive Engineer vs. Vitthal Damodar Patil (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court correctly assessed the expert valuation report for compensation in land acquisition cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Executive Engineer, M.I.W. vs. Vitthal Damodar Patil and Anr. [Judgment Date]: July 01, 2019 Date of the

Supreme Court Revisits Land Acquisition Compensation: Executive Engineer vs. Vitthal Damodar Patil (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case for Fresh Review of Deduction Percentage: Mahanti Devi vs. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (2019)

/ Deductions on Market Value, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Compensation, M.R. Shah, Market Value

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case for Fresh Review of Deduction Percentage: Mahanti Devi vs. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (2019) Date of the Judgment: February 8, 2019 Citation: Civil Appeal No.1572 of 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 29623 of 2016) Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and M.R. Shah, J. When determining compensation for land

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case for Fresh Review of Deduction Percentage: Mahanti Devi vs. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Haryana Acquisition Case: Wazir & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2019) INSC 24

/ Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Haryana Acquisition Case LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition/Civil. Case Name: Wazir & Anr. vs. State of Haryana. Judgment Date: 11 January 2019. Can the government acquire land for development and pay compensation based on

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Haryana Acquisition Case: Wazir & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2019) INSC 24 Read Post »

Supreme Court settles compensation claims after land vesting under the Himachal Pradesh Abolition Act: Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. vs. Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh (24 September 2018)

/ Arun Mishra, Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953, Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 with Section 2(5), Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 with Section 27, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Decides on Compensation After Land Vesting: Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. vs. Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh (2018) Date of the Judgment: 24 September 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 844 Judges: Arun Mishra J., S. Abdul Nazeer J. Can a person claim compensation for land that has already vested in the government under land reform

Supreme Court settles compensation claims after land vesting under the Himachal Pradesh Abolition Act: Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. vs. Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh (24 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores 50% Deduction for Land Development Charges in Land Acquisition Case: Union of India vs. Dyagala Devamma & Ors. (25 July 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Restores 50% Deduction for Land Development Charges in Land Acquisition Case Date of the Judgment: 25 July 2018 Citation: Union of India vs. Dyagala Devamma & Ors. (2018) INSC 682 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Uday Umesh Lalit, J. Can the High Court reduce the deduction for developmental charges when acquiring land? The

Supreme Court Restores 50% Deduction for Land Development Charges in Land Acquisition Case: Union of India vs. Dyagala Devamma & Ors. (25 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Maharashtra Farmer: Bilquis vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Maharashtra Farmer: Bilquis vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition, including valuation of trees and other improvements. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Bilquis vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others Judgment Date: May 11, 2018 Date of the Judgment: May 11,

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Maharashtra Farmer: Bilquis vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies ‘clerical error’ under Andhra Pradesh Land Revenue Act in Telangana Housing Board vs. Azamun nisa Begum Case (1 May 2018)

/ Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli with Section 87, Clerical Error, Deepak Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Madan B. Lokur

Supreme Court clarifies ‘clerical error’ under Andhra Pradesh Land Revenue Act in Telangana Housing Board vs. Azamun nisa Begum Case Date of the Judgment: 1 May 2018 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 4632-4638 of 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 21856-21862 of 2010) Judges: Madan B. Lokur, J., Deepak Gupta, J. Can a correction in

Supreme Court clarifies ‘clerical error’ under Andhra Pradesh Land Revenue Act in Telangana Housing Board vs. Azamun nisa Begum Case (1 May 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land acquisition compensation in Manimegalai vs. The Special Tahsildar case (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Fair Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court enhances land acquisition compensation in Manimegalai vs. The Special Tahsildar case (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Manimegalai vs. The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition Officer) Adi Dravidar Welfare. Judgment Date: April 16, 2018 Date of the

Supreme Court enhances land acquisition compensation in Manimegalai vs. The Special Tahsildar case (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Remedy for Non-Award of Interest in Land Acquisition Cases: Union of India vs. Pushpavathi (2018) INSC 113

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 28A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 34, R.K. Agrawal, Remedies, Writ Petition

Supreme Court Clarifies Remedy for Non-Award of Interest in Land Acquisition Cases Date of the Judgment: February 06, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 113 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. (authored the judgment) Can a landowner, aggrieved by the Collector’s failure to award interest on compensation in land acquisition cases, directly approach the Civil

Supreme Court Clarifies Remedy for Non-Award of Interest in Land Acquisition Cases: Union of India vs. Pushpavathi (2018) INSC 113 Read Post »

Scroll to Top