Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Retrospective Application of Solatium and Interest in Land Acquisition Cases: Union of India vs. Tarsem Singh (2025) INSC 146

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23(2), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 28, National Highways Act, 1956, National Highways Act, 1956 with Section 3J, Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan

Date of the Judgment: 04 February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 146 Judges: Surya Kant, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J. When land is acquired for public purposes, are landowners entitled to additional compensation even after the initial compensation has been determined and finalized? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a recent case concerning […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Retrospective Application of Solatium and Interest in Land Acquisition Cases: Union of India vs. Tarsem Singh (2025) INSC 146 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies interest on solatium under Land Acquisition Act: Food Corporation of India vs. Yarlagadda Narayana Apparao (2008)

/ Arijit Pasayat, Harjit Singh Bedi, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23(2)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 17, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat and Harjit Singh Bedi, JJ. Can interest be claimed on solatium under the Land Acquisition Act, even if not explicitly granted by the decree? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case involving the Food Corporation of India and landowners, focusing on

Supreme Court clarifies interest on solatium under Land Acquisition Act: Food Corporation of India vs. Yarlagadda Narayana Apparao (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top