Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case for Re-evaluation of Fruit Tree Valuation: State of Punjab vs. Thuru Ram (2018)

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case: State of Punjab vs. Thuru Ram (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Valuation of fruit trees on acquired land. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: State of Punjab and Ors. vs. Thuru Ram. [Judgment Date]: January 19, 2018 Date of the Judgment: January 19, 2018. Citation: Not Available. Judges: Arun Mishra, J. […]

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case for Re-evaluation of Fruit Tree Valuation: State of Punjab vs. Thuru Ram (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Landowners from Unfair Compensation in Delayed Land Acquisition: Mitesh Kumar Ramanbhai Patel & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. (2017)

Date of the Judgment: November 16, 2017 Citation: Mitesh Kumar Ramanbhai Patel & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat & Ors., Civil Appeal No(s). 19501-19503 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 21067-21069 of 2014) Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar. Can the government use consent forms obtained years

Supreme Court Protects Landowners from Unfair Compensation in Delayed Land Acquisition: Mitesh Kumar Ramanbhai Patel & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation in Haryana Acquisition Case: Bijender & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Anr. (27 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value of acquired land using the Belting System. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Bijender & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Anr. Judgment Date: 27 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 27 October 2017 Citation: Bijender & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Anr. (2017) INSC 919

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation in Haryana Acquisition Case: Bijender & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Anr. (27 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Land Compensation: Manoj Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2017) INSC 744 (13 September 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 13 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 744 Judges: Arun Mishra, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Is it justifiable for a High Court to blindly follow a previous judgment when determining land compensation, or should each case be evaluated based on its own merits and evidence? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Reduces Land Compensation: Manoj Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2017) INSC 744 (13 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Kale vs. Union of India

Can a landowner claim additional compensation for land if the government records show a different measurement than what they claim? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a land acquisition case, clarifying the importance of documented evidence. This case, *Kale (Dead) Rep. Thr. LRs. vs. Union of India*, involved a dispute over the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Kale vs. Union of India Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation based on average sale value: Vithal Rao vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for acquired land using comparable sales data, specifically when dealing with large land parcels and small plot sales. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Vithal Rao & Anr. Etc. vs. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Judgment Date: July 7, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 7, 2017 Citation:

Supreme Court enhances land compensation based on average sale value: Vithal Rao vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Power House Acquisition: N.D. Sharma vs. Union of India (2016)

Can land owners receive equal compensation when their land is acquired for the same project? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case concerning land acquisition for a power house. The Court ruled that landowners should receive the same compensation as their neighbors if their land is similarly situated. This decision

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Power House Acquisition: N.D. Sharma vs. Union of India (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Possession Decree After Land Acquisition: Market Committee Hodal vs. Sukhdevi (2015)

Date of the Judgment: 15th October, 2015 Citation: Not Available Judges: Anil R. Dave, J. and Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. Can a civil court decree possession of land when that land has already been acquired by the government? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case where a lower court had

Supreme Court Overturns Possession Decree After Land Acquisition: Market Committee Hodal vs. Sukhdevi (2015) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Land Acquisition Quashing: TNHB vs. Saraswathy (2015)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the quashing of land acquisition proceedings at the instance of some landowners nullifies the entire acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Chairman & Managing Director, TNHB & Anr vs. S. Saraswathy & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 11th May 2015 Date of the Judgment: 11th May 2015 Citation: Not Available in the

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Land Acquisition Quashing: TNHB vs. Saraswathy (2015) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Resumption of Land for Failure to Build Educational Complex: Raunaq Education Foundation vs. State of Haryana (2014)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State can resume land allotted to an educational foundation for failing to fulfill the conditions of allotment. CASE TYPE: Land Resumption. Case Name: Raunaq Education Foundation vs. State of Haryana. Judgment Date: 14th October 2014 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 14th October 2014. Citation: 2014 INSC 636. Judges: Justice V. Gopala

Supreme Court Upholds Resumption of Land for Failure to Build Educational Complex: Raunaq Education Foundation vs. State of Haryana (2014) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Kathuria Public Schools vs. Union of India (2016)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of land acquisition and possession in this case. The core legal question was whether the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) could take possession of land previously acquired, despite the appellant’s claims. This case highlights the importance of adhering to court orders and undertakings. Citation: This judgment is from

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Kathuria Public Schools vs. Union of India (2016) Read Post »

Land Acquisition: Supreme Court clarifies government’s power in Jayamma & Ors. vs. The Deputy Commissioner, Hassan (2013)

Date of the Judgment: May 6, 2013 Citation: [2013] INSC 310 Judges: G.S. Singhvi, J., Kurian Joseph, J. Can a High Court compel the government to complete land acquisition proceedings? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning land acquisition in Karnataka. The Court clarified that it cannot force the government

Land Acquisition: Supreme Court clarifies government’s power in Jayamma & Ors. vs. The Deputy Commissioner, Hassan (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top