Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Scheme No. 97: Indore Development Authority vs. Burhani Grih Nirman (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Indore Development Authority’s (IDA) Scheme No. 97 had lapsed under Section 54 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973, and whether the land acquisition process was valid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition […]
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Scheme No. 97: Indore Development Authority vs. Burhani Grih Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit (2023) Date of the Judgment: 03 March 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 200 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a development scheme be invalidated if not fully implemented within three years? The Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Land Used Without Acquisition: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Rajiv (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a landowner is entitled to compensation when their land is used for public purposes without formal acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. vs. Rajiv and Anr. [Judgment Date]: February
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Public Use: State of Haryana vs. Niranjan Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State can refuse to release acquired land when a significant portion of similarly situated lands has already been released. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: State of Haryana & Ors. vs. Niranjan Singh & Ors. Etc.
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Public Use, Reverses High Court Order: State of Haryana vs. Niranjan Singh (2023) Date of the Judgment: 24 February 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 167 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a state government selectively release acquired land, favoring some landowners over others? The Supreme Court of
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land
Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishan Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE:
Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition: Ravinder Kumar Goel vs. State of Haryana (2023) Date of the Judgment: February 15, 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1173 of 2023 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 3585 of 2022) Judges: A.S. Bopanna, J. and Hima Kohli, J. Can land acquisition compensation be fairly determined when agricultural
Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition: Ravinder Kumar Goel vs. State of Haryana (2023) Date of the Judgment: 15 February 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 129 Judges: A.S. Bopanna, J. and Hima Kohli, J. Can land losers receive fair compensation when their land is acquired for public projects? The Supreme Court of India addressed this
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation is deposited in the treasury instead of being paid to
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) Date of the Judgment: February 9, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 107 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if compensation was deposited in the treasury instead of directly
Supreme Court on Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Challenge Acquisition Lapse LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the right to challenge the acquisition of that land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, claiming it has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
