Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Possession, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation is deposited in the treasury instead of being paid to […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, even if possession is taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20 January 2023 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Locus Standi, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta: Supreme Court Upholds Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken, but compensation is not paid, and whether a subsequent purchaser has the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsing Claim by Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsing Claim by Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can challenge the acquisition of that land under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. CASE TYPE: Land

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsing Claim by Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Omvir Singh (2022) – Land Acquisition

/ Hima Kohli, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Omvir Singh (2022) – Land Acquisition LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, considering delays and prior judgments. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Omvir Singh & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 15 December 2022 Date

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Omvir Singh (2022) – Land Acquisition Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Mohd. Maqbool (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Mohd. Maqbool (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not tendered, even if possession has been

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Mohd. Maqbool (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Suresh B. Kapur (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Suresh B. Kapur (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is deposited in court but

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Suresh B. Kapur (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Land Compensation: Land Acquisition Act Case (22 November 2022)

/ J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Land Compensation: Land Acquisition Act Case (22 November 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, including the validity of deductions for development charges. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Revenue Divisional Officer & Anr. vs. Ismail Bhai and Others Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Land Compensation: Land Acquisition Act Case (22 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Denies Relief to Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini Wadhwa (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Locus Standi, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Subsequent Purchaser

Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini Wadhwa: Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can claim the acquisition has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Denies Relief to Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini Wadhwa (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (20 October 2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired for public projects. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Jaspal Singh & Others vs. The State of Haryana and Others. Judgment Date: 20 October 2022. Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (20 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation at Rs. 1,000 Per Square Yard in Land Acquisition Case: Radhey Sham vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation at Rs. 1,000 Per Square Yard in Land Acquisition Case: Radhey Sham vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Radhey Sham vs. The State of Haryana and Others [Judgment Date]: October

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation at Rs. 1,000 Per Square Yard in Land Acquisition Case: Radhey Sham vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Defines “Initiated” in Land Acquisition Act: Haryana State Industrial vs. Deepak Aggarwal (28 July 2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Abhay S. Oka, C.T. Ravikumar, General Clauses Act, 1897, General Clauses Act, 1897 with Section 6, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 114, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Initiation Under 2013 Act LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of the term “initiated” in Section 24(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, concerning land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law Case Name: Haryana State Industrial

Supreme Court Defines “Initiated” in Land Acquisition Act: Haryana State Industrial vs. Deepak Aggarwal (28 July 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top