Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6(1)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Rules for Karnataka Housing Board: Karnataka Housing Board vs. State of Karnataka (28 July 2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Karnataka Housing Board Act, 1962, Karnataka Housing Board Act, 1962 with Section 24(2), Karnataka Housing Board Act, 1962 with Section 33(2), Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 5A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6(1)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Rules for Karnataka Housing Board Introduction Date of the Judgment: 28 July 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) acquire land without a pre-approved housing scheme? The Supreme Court recently addressed this critical question, clarifying the relationship […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Rules for Karnataka Housing Board: Karnataka Housing Board vs. State of Karnataka (28 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Landowners in Noida Land Acquisition Case

/ A.K. Sikri, Constitutional Law, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 5A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6(1), M.R. Shah, Right to Property, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Landowners in Noida Land Acquisition Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether landowners are entitled to compensation when their land was acquired without proper procedure and construction was carried out on it. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Lt. Col. J.B. Kuchhal (Dead) Through Lrs. And Ors.

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Landowners in Noida Land Acquisition Case Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Market Expansion Despite Procedural Lapses: Special Agricultural Produce Market Committee vs. N. Krishnappa (2017) INSC 372 (17 April 2017)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 5A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6(1), Navin Sinha, Ranjan Gogoi, The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Can a land acquisition be upheld even with procedural errors? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning land acquisition for a market expansion. The Court acknowledged procedural infirmities but upheld the acquisition, emphasizing the larger public interest. This case highlights the balance between procedural compliance and public benefit in land

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Market Expansion Despite Procedural Lapses: Special Agricultural Produce Market Committee vs. N. Krishnappa (2017) INSC 372 (17 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bombay High Court Order in Land Acquisition Dispute: Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited vs. State of Maharashtra (2013)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, G. S. Singhvi, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6(1), Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, V. Gopala Gowda

Date of the Judgment: July 11, 2013 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: G. S. Singhvi, J. and V. Gopala Gowda, J. Can a government agency claim land acquired decades ago, especially when significant developments have occurred on the land? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case involving the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited

Supreme Court Upholds Bombay High Court Order in Land Acquisition Dispute: Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited vs. State of Maharashtra (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top