Review Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation Based on Non-Cumulative Increase: Manik Panjabrao Kalmegh vs. Executive Engineer Bembla Project Division (2024)

/ Compensation, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 54, Review Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation Based on Non-Cumulative Increase: Manik Panjabrao Kalmegh vs. Executive Engineer Bembla Project Division (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the additional compensation granted by the Reference Court in a review application for trees and a borewell on acquired land, and whether the compensation […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation Based on Non-Cumulative Increase: Manik Panjabrao Kalmegh vs. Executive Engineer Bembla Project Division (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories in Review Petition: Arun Dev Upadhyaya vs. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. (2023) INSC 610 (5 July 2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 46, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XLVII Rule 1, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Review Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories Date of the Judgment: 5 July 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 610 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Vikram Nath, J. Can a foreign arbitral award be enforced against individuals or entities not directly party to the arbitration agreement? The Supreme Court of India, in this review

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories in Review Petition: Arun Dev Upadhyaya vs. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. (2023) INSC 610 (5 July 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Review Jurisdiction in Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan & Ors. (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 47 Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 114, Judges, M. R. Shah, Review Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Limits Review Jurisdiction in Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Property Dispute Case Name: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan & Ors. [Judgment Date]: February

Supreme Court Limits Review Jurisdiction in Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court’s Review Order on Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan (24 February 2023)

/ Appellate Jurisdiction, C.T. Ravikumar, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 47 Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 114, Judges, M. R. Shah, Review Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Overturns High Court’s Review Order on Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Property Dispute. Case Name: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan & Ors. Judgment Date: 24

Supreme Court Overturns High Court’s Review Order on Property Dispute: S. Murali Sundaram vs. Jothibai Kannan (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Insolvency Case: Vishal Vijay Kalantri vs. Shailen Shah (2022) INSC 429

/ Ajay Rastogi, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 62, Judges, Review Jurisdiction, Review Petition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Insolvency Case: Vishal Vijay Kalantri vs. Shailen Shah (2022) INSC 429 Date of the Judgment: May 04, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 429 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a review petition be entertained if it does not present any new grounds for reconsideration? The Supreme

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Insolvency Case: Vishal Vijay Kalantri vs. Shailen Shah (2022) INSC 429 Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Cryptic Review Order in Service Matter: Ratan Lal Patel vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwavidyalaya (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Civil Procedure, Judges, M.R. Shah, Review Jurisdiction, Review of Judgments, Service Law

Supreme Court Sets Aside Cryptic Review Order in Service Matter: Ratan Lal Patel vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwavidyalaya (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can allow a review petition without specifying the error apparent on the face of the record. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Ratan Lal Patel vs. Dr. Hari Singh

Supreme Court Sets Aside Cryptic Review Order in Service Matter: Ratan Lal Patel vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwavidyalaya (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (23 February 2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Review Jurisdiction, Review Petition, Service Law, State of Uttar Pradesh, Supreme Court of India, Teacher Recruitment, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a review petition filed by non-parties to a previous litigation should be entertained when the issue has been considered multiple times. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Vijay Pratap Yadav and Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Review Jurisdiction, Review Jurisdiction Principles, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 40 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a review petition be entertained if it does not point out any error apparent on the record?

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court dismisses review petition due to delay in filing: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Limitation, Review Jurisdiction, Review Petition, Supreme Court Procedure, Uday Umesh Lalit

Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit J., Ajay Rastogi J. Can a review petition be entertained if there is an inordinate delay in filing the special leave petition? The Supreme Court addressed this issue in a recent case where a review petition was dismissed due to a significant delay in

Supreme Court dismisses review petition due to delay in filing: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ownership: Harwansh Kaur vs. SADA (2021)

/ Civil Law, Judges, Land Ownership Dispute, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code with Section 158(3)(1), Review Jurisdiction, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ownership: Harwansh Kaur vs. SADA (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can exercise review jurisdiction to re-examine issues already decided on merits. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Ownership Dispute Case Name: Harwansh Kaur & Anr. vs. Special Area Development Authority (Counter Magnet), Gwalior & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 22 October

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ownership: Harwansh Kaur vs. SADA (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Petition Scope in Religious Freedom Cases: Kantaru Rajeevaru vs. Indian Young Lawyers Association (2020)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ashok Bhushan, B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 25, Constitutional Law with Article 26, Fundamental Rights, Indu Malhotra, Inherent Powers, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy, Ranjan Gogoi, Review Jurisdiction, S. Abdul Nazeer, S.A. Bobde, Supreme Court of India, Supreme Court Rules, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Petition Scope in Religious Freedom Cases (2020) Date of the Judgment: 11 May 2020 Citation: Not Available Judges: S.A. Bobde, CJI, R. Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan, L. Nageswara Rao, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, S. Abdul Nazeer, R. Subhash Reddy, B.R. Gavai, and Surya Kant, JJ. This was a nine-judge bench. Can the Supreme

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Petition Scope in Religious Freedom Cases: Kantaru Rajeevaru vs. Indian Young Lawyers Association (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top