Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Suresh B. Kapur (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Suresh B. Kapur (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is deposited in court but […]

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Suresh B. Kapur (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishna Saini (2 December 2022)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishna Saini (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, lapse due to non-payment of compensation under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013,

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishna Saini (2 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Karampal (2022)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Karampal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013,

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Karampal (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Sudesh Verma (2 December 2022)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 24(2), Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act Date of the Judgment: 2 December 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 8929 of 2022 (@ SLP (C) No. 21810 of 2022) (@ DIARY NO. 27937 OF 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Sudesh Verma (2 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Jain (2022)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Jain (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if possession was not taken due to

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Jain (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Land and Building Department vs. Mahipal Singh (2022)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Land and Building Department vs. Mahipal Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not tendered before the Act came into force, despite possession being taken? CASE

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Land and Building Department vs. Mahipal Singh (2022) Read Post »

Land Valuation Remanded: Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Land Acquisition Case – State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Radheshyam (24 November 2022)

/ Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Market Value Determination, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Fresh Valuation: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Radheshyam LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value and permissible deductions in land acquisition compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. vs. Radheshyam & Ors. Judgment Date: 24 November 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Land Valuation Remanded: Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Land Acquisition Case – State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Radheshyam (24 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: Department of Land and Building vs. Anjeet Singh (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Award, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: Department of Land and Building vs. Anjeet Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if either possession is not taken or compensation is not paid. CASE

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: Department of Land and Building vs. Anjeet Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma (24 November 2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid,

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma (24 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Land Compensation: Land Acquisition Act Case (22 November 2022)

/ J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Land Compensation: Land Acquisition Act Case (22 November 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, including the validity of deductions for development charges. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Revenue Divisional Officer & Anr. vs. Ismail Bhai and Others Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Land Compensation: Land Acquisition Act Case (22 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Interest on Delayed Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Rameshwar (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Limits Interest on Delayed Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Rameshwar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether statutory benefits and interest should be awarded for the period of delay in filing appeals for enhanced land compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Rameshwar @ Ramesh Chandra Sharma (Dead) Through Legal Heir

Supreme Court Limits Interest on Delayed Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Rameshwar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty on Court Auction Sales: Registrar of Assurances vs. ASL Vyapar (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 47A, Judges, Market Value, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Stamp Duty, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty on Court Auction Sales: Registrar of Assurances vs. ASL Vyapar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Registering Authority can assess market value of a property sold through court-monitored public auction for stamp duty purposes. CASE TYPE: Property Law, Stamp Duty Case Name: Registrar of Assurances & Anr. vs. ASL Vyapar Private

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty on Court Auction Sales: Registrar of Assurances vs. ASL Vyapar (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top