Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Denies Relief to Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini Wadhwa (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Locus Standi, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Subsequent Purchaser

Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini Wadhwa: Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can claim the acquisition has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Denies Relief to Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini Wadhwa (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013: Delhi Development Authority vs. Krishan Lal Arora & Ors. (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 24(2), M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: DDA vs. Krishan Lal Arora (2022) Date of the Judgment: 02 November 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 7960 of 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed solely because compensation wasn’t paid

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013: Delhi Development Authority vs. Krishan Lal Arora & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Hari Ram vs. Land Acquisition Collector (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation in Haryana LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Hari Ram (Deceased) Thr. His LRs. and Anr. vs. Land Acquisition Collector cum District Revenue Officer Gurgaon and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20 October 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 October

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Hari Ram vs. Land Acquisition Collector (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (20 October 2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired for public projects. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Jaspal Singh & Others vs. The State of Haryana and Others. Judgment Date: 20 October 2022. Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (20 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation at Rs. 1,000 Per Square Yard in Land Acquisition Case: Radhey Sham vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation at Rs. 1,000 Per Square Yard in Land Acquisition Case: Radhey Sham vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Radhey Sham vs. The State of Haryana and Others [Judgment Date]: October

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation at Rs. 1,000 Per Square Yard in Land Acquisition Case: Radhey Sham vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Industrial Development in Karnataka: M/S. M.S.P.L. Limited vs. The State of Karnataka (2022) INSC 903 (11 October 2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Industrial Development, Judges, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 with Section 28, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 with Section 3(1), Karnataka Industries (Facilitation) Act, 2002, Land Acquisition, Project Approval, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Industrial Development in Karnataka Date of the Judgment: 11 October 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 903 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J., Vikram Nath, J. Can the government acquire land for industrial development, even if it benefits a private company? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Industrial Development in Karnataka: M/S. M.S.P.L. Limited vs. The State of Karnataka (2022) INSC 903 (11 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Disbursement in Land Acquisition Cases: Kazi Moinuddin Kazi Bashiroddin vs. MTDC (2022)

/ Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Disbursement in Land Acquisition Cases: Kazi Moinuddin Kazi Bashiroddin vs. MTDC (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Supreme Court orders regarding disbursement of enhanced compensation in land acquisition cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Kazi Moinuddin Kazi Bashiroddin & Ors. vs. The Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 30

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Disbursement in Land Acquisition Cases: Kazi Moinuddin Kazi Bashiroddin vs. MTDC (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsed Claims Under 2013 Act

/ Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsed Claims Under 2013 Act LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding lapse of land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority v. Shiv Kumar and others; Government of

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsed Claims Under 2013 Act Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Compensation Apportionment under Land Acquisition Act: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 436

/ Appeals, Civil Procedure, Compensation Apportionment, Impleadment of Parties, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 30, M.R. Shah, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Settles Compensation Apportionment Under Land Acquisition Act: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 436 LEGAL ISSUE: Dispute regarding the apportionment of compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. and Others Judgment Date:

Supreme Court settles Compensation Apportionment under Land Acquisition Act: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 436 Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances compensation for land acquisition in Haryana: Amanullah Khan vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 28A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation in Haryana Acquisition Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Amanullah Khan vs. The State of Haryana and Another Judgment Date: 8 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 8 September 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 747

Supreme Court enhances compensation for land acquisition in Haryana: Amanullah Khan vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 66, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 90, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, Execution of Decrees, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, M.M. Sundresh, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an auction sale of property can be set aside due to procedural irregularities after multiple opportunities for objections were missed by the judgment debtor, and whether a bona fide auction purchaser’s rights are

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Highways, Clarifies Rule 5 of Tamil Nadu Highways Rules: M. Mohan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Procedure for objections, Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001, Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 with Section 15, Tamil Nadu Highways Rules, 2003, Tamil Nadu Highways Rules, 2003 with Rule 5

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Highways, Clarifies Rule 5 of Tamil Nadu Highways Rules: M. Mohan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 2, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 742 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a land acquisition be invalidated if the requisitioning authority’s response to objections

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Highways, Clarifies Rule 5 of Tamil Nadu Highways Rules: M. Mohan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top