Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Supreme Court Modifies Land Compensation: Union of India vs. Premlata (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Modifies Land Compensation: Union of India vs. Premlata (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition, specifically regarding the deduction for development charges. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Union of India vs. Premlata and Others Judgment Date: 06 April 2022 Date of the Judgment: 06 April 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC […]

Supreme Court Modifies Land Compensation: Union of India vs. Premlata (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: APMC vs. State of Karnataka (22 March 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 17(4), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: APMC vs. State of Karnataka (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisitions had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Bangalore vs. The State of Karnataka

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: APMC vs. State of Karnataka (22 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation, modifies High Court order: Jai Parkash vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Market Value Determination

Supreme Court enhances land compensation, modifies High Court order: Jai Parkash vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the appropriate deduction to be applied from the sale price of exemplar land. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Jai Parkash Etc

Supreme Court enhances land compensation, modifies High Court order: Jai Parkash vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Proper Market Value Assessment: Pramina Devi vs. State of Jharkhand (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Market Value Assessment

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Proper Market Value Assessment: Pramina Devi vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of Fair Market Value in Land Acquisition Cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Pramina Devi (Dead) Thr. LRs. vs. State of Jharkhand. Judgment Date: 10 March 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Proper Market Value Assessment: Pramina Devi vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Land Acquisition Case: Sanjay Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2022)

/ Additional Evidence, B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 27, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Land Acquisition Case: Sanjay Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) Date of the Judgment: March 10, 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can an appellate court allow additional evidence in a land acquisition case to ensure fair compensation? The Supreme Court addressed this question in

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Land Acquisition Case: Sanjay Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition after reservation lapse: Kolhapur Municipal Corporation vs. Vasant Mahadev Patil (2022)

/ Acquisition of Land, B.V. Nagarathna, Development Plan, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 with Section 126, Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 with Section 127

Supreme Court on Lapsed Land Reservations: Kolhapur Municipal Corporation vs. Vasant Mahadev Patil LEGAL ISSUE: Can a Municipal Corporation be compelled to acquire land after the reservation for public use has lapsed under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966? CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Town Planning Case Name: The Kolhapur Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition after reservation lapse: Kolhapur Municipal Corporation vs. Vasant Mahadev Patil (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes High Court order directing land acquisition: Kolhapur Municipal Corporation vs. Vasant Mahadev Patil (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 with Section 126, Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 with Section 127, Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 with Section 22

Supreme Court quashes High Court order directing land acquisition: Kolhapur Municipal Corporation vs. Vasant Mahadev Patil (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can mandate a municipal corporation to acquire land and pay compensation when the land reservation has lapsed and is unsuitable for its intended purpose. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition and Town Planning. Case

Supreme Court quashes High Court order directing land acquisition: Kolhapur Municipal Corporation vs. Vasant Mahadev Patil (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court orders joint hearing of land acquisition appeals: M.P. Housing Board vs. Satish Kumar Batra (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 5-A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court orders joint hearing of land acquisition appeals: M.P. Housing Board vs. Satish Kumar Batra (2022) Date of the Judgment: February 10, 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a High Court decide a case related to land acquisition when a related case concerning the same land is already pending before

Supreme Court orders joint hearing of land acquisition appeals: M.P. Housing Board vs. Satish Kumar Batra (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) vs. Yunus & Ors. (03 February 2022)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 28A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 20, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 21, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Clarifies: Lok Adalat Awards Cannot Trigger Land Compensation Redetermination Under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an award passed by a Lok Adalat under Section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 can be the basis for redetermination of compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act,

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) vs. Yunus & Ors. (03 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation: Madhukar Kamble vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (2022)

/ Compensation, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Valuation, Property Law, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation: Madhukar Kamble vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Madhukar S/O Govindrao Kamble & Ors. vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation & Ors. Judgment Date: January 31, 2022 Date of the Judgment: January 31, 2022 Citation:

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation: Madhukar Kamble vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition: Madhukar Kamble vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Market Value, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition: Madhukar Kamble vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired for public purposes. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Madhukar S/O Govindrao Kamble & Ors. vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation & Ors. Judgment Date: 31 January 2022 Date of

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition: Madhukar Kamble vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (20 January 2022)

/ Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 with Section 36(1), Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 applies to land acquisitions made under the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (20 January 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top