Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (20 January 2022)

/ Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 with Section 36(1), Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Legislation by Incorporation, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (2022) Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 782 Judges: S. Abdul Nazeer, J. and Sanjiv Khanna, J. Can the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) acquire land using the old Land Acquisition Act of […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (20 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority

/ Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 with Section 36, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11-A, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 to acquisitions made by the Bangalore Development Authority. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Bangalore Development Authority &

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23(1)(A)

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in reducing the additional compensation awarded by the Reference Court in land acquisition cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Ambalal Babulal Patel ETC. ETC. vs. The Group General Manager, ONGC &

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23(1)(A)

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in reducing the additional compensation awarded by the Reference Court in land acquisition cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Ambalal Babulal Patel ETC. ETC. vs. The Group General Manager, ONGC &

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in reducing the additional compensation awarded by the Reference Court in a land acquisition case. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Ambalal Babulal Patel ETC. ETC. vs. The Group General Manager, ONGC

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Land Release Notification Citing Fraud: U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad vs. Noor Mohammad (2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, General Clauses Act, 1897, General Clauses Act, 1897 with Section 21, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 48(1), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Land Release Notification Citing Fraud: U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad vs. Noor Mohammad (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a notification issued under Section 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, releasing land from acquisition, can be rescinded by the government if it was obtained through fraud and misrepresentation. CASE TYPE: Land

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Land Release Notification Citing Fraud: U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad vs. Noor Mohammad (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Kerala: Soman vs. Inland Waterways Authority (2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23, Land Valuation, Property Law

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Kerala: Soman vs. Inland Waterways Authority (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Soman v. Inland Waterways Authority of India & Anr. Judgment Date: 10 December 2021 Date of the Judgment: 10 December

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Kerala: Soman vs. Inland Waterways Authority (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Dismissing Claims of Concealment: Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors. (2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Mysore (Personal & Miscellaneous) Inam Abolition Act, 1954, Mysore (Personal & Miscellaneous) Inam Abolition Act, 1954 with Section 5, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Dismissing Claims of Concealment: Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in dismissing the writ petition on grounds of suppression of material facts and whether the land acquisition by Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) was valid. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Dismissing Claims of Concealment: Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. vs. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the rights of Bangalore Development Authority in property disputes: Bangalore Development Authority vs. N. Nanjappa and another (2021) INSC 727 (06 December 2021)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 with Section 17, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 with Section 19, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 101, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 97, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16(2), M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights of Bangalore Development Authority in Property Disputes Date of the Judgment: 06 December 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 727 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a development authority’s claim to land acquired decades ago be ignored in a property dispute between private parties? The Supreme Court addressed this critical

Supreme Court clarifies the rights of Bangalore Development Authority in property disputes: Bangalore Development Authority vs. N. Nanjappa and another (2021) INSC 727 (06 December 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Lack of Urgency: Hamid Ali Khan vs. State of U.P. (23 November 2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 17(4), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 5A, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Lack of Urgency: Hamid Ali Khan vs. State of U.P. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the invocation of the urgency clause under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was justified, thereby dispensing with the inquiry under Section 5A. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Hamid Ali Khan (D)

Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Lack of Urgency: Hamid Ali Khan vs. State of U.P. (23 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Anil Kumar Soti vs. State of U.P. (23 November 2021)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M. R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Anil Kumar Soti vs. State of U.P. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Anil Kumar Soti & Ors. vs. State of U.P. through Collector Bijnore (U.P.). Judgment Date: 23 November 2021 Introduction

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Anil Kumar Soti vs. State of U.P. (23 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Taj Sultanpur: Chitrabai & Anr. vs. Deputy Chief Engineer (2021)

/ Compensation, Fair Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Taj Sultanpur: Chitrabai & Anr. vs. Deputy Chief Engineer (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Chitrabai & Anr. vs. Deputy Chief Engineer (Constructions), South Central Railways-III, Secunderabad & Another Judgment Date: November 18, 2021 Date of the Judgment: November

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Taj Sultanpur: Chitrabai & Anr. vs. Deputy Chief Engineer (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top