Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Supreme Court Reduces Land Compensation: Manoj Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2017) INSC 744 (13 September 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 13 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 744 Judges: Arun Mishra, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Is it justifiable for a High Court to blindly follow a previous judgment when determining land compensation, or should each case be evaluated based on its own merits and evidence? The Supreme Court of India […]

Supreme Court Reduces Land Compensation: Manoj Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2017) INSC 744 (13 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation Despite Lower Claim: Narendra & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2017)

Can a court award compensation higher than what was claimed by a landowner in land acquisition cases? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case. The Court ruled that it can award fair compensation based on the true market value, regardless of the initial claim. This decision ensures that landowners receive

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation Despite Lower Claim: Narendra & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Case: Nelatur Sampoornamma vs. Special Deputy Collector (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for fruit-bearing trees in land acquisition cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Nelatur Sampoornamma vs. Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Telugu Ganga Project Judgment Date: July 19, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: July 19, 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 664 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., R. Banumathi, J. (authored the

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Case: Nelatur Sampoornamma vs. Special Deputy Collector (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court condones delay in land acquisition appeal, enhances compensation for pomegranate and lime trees (July 19, 2017)

Can a delay of 3671 days in filing an appeal be condoned? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a land acquisition case. The Court considered whether the High Court was right in dismissing the appeal due to the delay and also looked into the adequacy of compensation for fruit-bearing trees. This

Supreme Court condones delay in land acquisition appeal, enhances compensation for pomegranate and lime trees (July 19, 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Kale vs. Union of India

Can a landowner claim additional compensation for land if the government records show a different measurement than what they claim? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a land acquisition case, clarifying the importance of documented evidence. This case, *Kale (Dead) Rep. Thr. LRs. vs. Union of India*, involved a dispute over the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Kale vs. Union of India Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation based on average sale value: Vithal Rao vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for acquired land using comparable sales data, specifically when dealing with large land parcels and small plot sales. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Vithal Rao & Anr. Etc. vs. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Judgment Date: July 7, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 7, 2017 Citation:

Supreme Court enhances land compensation based on average sale value: Vithal Rao vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition impact on earnest money forfeiture in property sale agreements: Ramesh Chand vs. Tanmay Developers (2017) INSC 370 (26 April 2017)

Can a land acquisition nullify the forfeiture of earnest money in a prior agreement to sell? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case, clarifying the interplay between land acquisition proceedings and private contracts. This judgment highlights the importance of civil suits in resolving contractual disputes, especially when land is acquired

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition impact on earnest money forfeiture in property sale agreements: Ramesh Chand vs. Tanmay Developers (2017) INSC 370 (26 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Market Expansion Despite Procedural Lapses: Special Agricultural Produce Market Committee vs. N. Krishnappa (2017) INSC 372 (17 April 2017)

Can a land acquisition be upheld even with procedural errors? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning land acquisition for a market expansion. The Court acknowledged procedural infirmities but upheld the acquisition, emphasizing the larger public interest. This case highlights the balance between procedural compliance and public benefit in land

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Market Expansion Despite Procedural Lapses: Special Agricultural Produce Market Committee vs. N. Krishnappa (2017) INSC 372 (17 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act: Applicability of 2013 Act (25 January 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 58 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., R.K. Agrawal, J. Can the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (New LA Act) be applied when land is acquired under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (KIAD

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act: Applicability of 2013 Act (25 January 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation: Om Parkash & Ors. vs. State of Haryana (2016)

Can a court enhance land compensation when the Land Acquisition Collector has undervalued the land? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a case concerning land acquisition in Haryana. This judgment clarifies the principles for determining fair compensation for land acquired by the government. The Supreme Court bench consisted of Justices Kurian

Supreme Court enhances land compensation: Om Parkash & Ors. vs. State of Haryana (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Power House Acquisition: N.D. Sharma vs. Union of India (2016)

Can land owners receive equal compensation when their land is acquired for the same project? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case concerning land acquisition for a power house. The Court ruled that landowners should receive the same compensation as their neighbors if their land is similarly situated. This decision

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Power House Acquisition: N.D. Sharma vs. Union of India (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Possession Decree After Land Acquisition: Market Committee Hodal vs. Sukhdevi (2015)

Date of the Judgment: 15th October, 2015 Citation: Not Available Judges: Anil R. Dave, J. and Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. Can a civil court decree possession of land when that land has already been acquired by the government? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case where a lower court had

Supreme Court Overturns Possession Decree After Land Acquisition: Market Committee Hodal vs. Sukhdevi (2015) Read Post »

Scroll to Top