Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Landowners in Noida Land Acquisition Case

/ A.K. Sikri, Constitutional Law, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 5A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6(1), M.R. Shah, Right to Property, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Landowners in Noida Land Acquisition Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether landowners are entitled to compensation when their land was acquired without proper procedure and construction was carried out on it. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Lt. Col. J.B. Kuchhal (Dead) Through Lrs. And Ors. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Landowners in Noida Land Acquisition Case Read Post »

Supreme Court Reconsiders the Proviso of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act in Land Acquisition Cases: Delhi Development Authority vs. Virender Lal Bahri (27 February 2019)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Process, R.F. Nariman, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Reconsiders Land Acquisition Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Virender Lal Bahri Date of the Judgment: 27 February 2019 The Supreme Court of India is revisiting a crucial aspect of land acquisition law. The central question revolves around the interpretation of a proviso within Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency

Supreme Court Reconsiders the Proviso of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act in Land Acquisition Cases: Delhi Development Authority vs. Virender Lal Bahri (27 February 2019) Read Post »

Land Acquisition Compensation: Supreme Court Dismisses Claim for Enhanced Compensation in M/S. Model Economic Township Ltd. vs. Land Acquisition Collector (26 February 2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 28A, Redetermination of Compensation, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Land Compensation Claim: M/S. Model Economic Township Ltd. vs. Land Acquisition Collector (2019) Date of the Judgment: 26 February 2019 Citation: M/S. Model Economic Township Ltd. vs. Land Acquisition Collector, SLP(C)No.618 of 2018, 2019 INSC 155 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Hemant Gupta, J. Can a company that missed

Land Acquisition Compensation: Supreme Court Dismisses Claim for Enhanced Compensation in M/S. Model Economic Township Ltd. vs. Land Acquisition Collector (26 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court modifies interim order on land compensation: GMDA vs. Arminderjit Kaur (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Compensation, Dinesh Maheshwari, Interim Relief, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act

Supreme Court modifies interim order on land compensation: GMDA vs. Arminderjit Kaur (2019) Date of the Judgment: February 26, 2019 Citation: Not Available Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. and Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can a High Court, in an interim order, direct the deposit of a specific amount of compensation in a land acquisition case? The

Supreme Court modifies interim order on land compensation: GMDA vs. Arminderjit Kaur (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case for Fresh Review of Deduction Percentage: Mahanti Devi vs. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (2019)

/ Deductions on Market Value, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Compensation, M.R. Shah, Market Value

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case for Fresh Review of Deduction Percentage: Mahanti Devi vs. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (2019) Date of the Judgment: February 8, 2019 Citation: Civil Appeal No.1572 of 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 29623 of 2016) Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and M.R. Shah, J. When determining compensation for land

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case for Fresh Review of Deduction Percentage: Mahanti Devi vs. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land compensation: Er. K. Arumugam vs. V. Balakrishnan & Ors. (2019)

/ Compensation, Contempt Jurisdiction, Contempt of Court, Judges, Land Acquisition, R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land compensation: Er. K. Arumugam vs. V. Balakrishnan & Ors. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can, in contempt proceedings, go beyond the original order to determine compensation. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court/Land Acquisition. Case Name: Er. K. Arumugam vs. V. Balakrishnan & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 06

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land compensation: Er. K. Arumugam vs. V. Balakrishnan & Ors. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition compensation under the 2013 Act: Hori Lal vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 17, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, R. Subhash Reddy, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 113

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition compensation under the 2013 Act: Hori Lal vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, when the award is passed after the repeal of the Act and the enactment of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition compensation under the 2013 Act: Hori Lal vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Haryana Acquisition Case: Wazir & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2019) INSC 24

/ Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Haryana Acquisition Case LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition/Civil. Case Name: Wazir & Anr. vs. State of Haryana. Judgment Date: 11 January 2019. Can the government acquire land for development and pay compensation based on

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Haryana Acquisition Case: Wazir & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2019) INSC 24 Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Lemon and Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases (20 November 2018)

/ Compensation, Deepak Gupta, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1)

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Lemon and Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases (20 November 2018) Date of the Judgment: 20 November 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Kurian Joseph, Deepak Gupta, Hemant Gupta, JJ. Can the government provide different compensation for the same type of trees acquired under the same notification? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Lemon and Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases (20 November 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Lemon and Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases (20 November 2018)

/ Compensation for Trees, Constitutional Law, Deepak Gupta, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Right to Equality

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Lemon and Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases (20 November 2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for trees on land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: D. Eswara Naidu & Ors. vs. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A) & Other Connected Matters Judgment

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Lemon and Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases (20 November 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Lemon and Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Deepak Gupta, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Compensation, Property Law, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Lemon and Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for trees on land acquired by the government. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: D. Eswara Naidu & Ors. vs. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A) & Other Connected Matters Judgment Date: 20 November 2018 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Lemon and Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Open Remand for Land Compensation: Ali Akbar vs. State of Kerala (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Compensation, Evidence, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition, Reference Court, Remand

Supreme Court Orders Open Remand for Land Compensation: Ali Akbar vs. State of Kerala (2018) Date of the Judgment: 26 October 2018 Citation: Civil Appeal No(s). 10786-10787 of 2018, Civil Appeal No(s). 10788-10796 of 2018 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., A.M. Khanwilkar, J. Can a High Court remand a land acquisition compensation case back to the

Supreme Court Orders Open Remand for Land Compensation: Ali Akbar vs. State of Kerala (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top