Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Supreme Court ensures uniform compensation in land acquisition cases: Munshiya vs. State of U.P. (2017)

Can land owners receive different compensation for land acquired under the same notification? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this issue in a case concerning land acquisition compensation. The court emphasized the need for uniformity in compensation for land acquired under the same notification. This judgment ensures that landowners receive equal treatment. Citation: (2017) […]

Supreme Court ensures uniform compensation in land acquisition cases: Munshiya vs. State of U.P. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Kale vs. Union of India

Can a landowner claim additional compensation for land if the government records show a different measurement than what they claim? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a land acquisition case, clarifying the importance of documented evidence. This case, *Kale (Dead) Rep. Thr. LRs. vs. Union of India*, involved a dispute over the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation: Kale vs. Union of India Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation based on average sale value: Vithal Rao vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for acquired land using comparable sales data, specifically when dealing with large land parcels and small plot sales. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Vithal Rao & Anr. Etc. vs. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Judgment Date: July 7, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 7, 2017 Citation:

Supreme Court enhances land compensation based on average sale value: Vithal Rao vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition impact on earnest money forfeiture in property sale agreements: Ramesh Chand vs. Tanmay Developers (2017) INSC 370 (26 April 2017)

Can a land acquisition nullify the forfeiture of earnest money in a prior agreement to sell? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case, clarifying the interplay between land acquisition proceedings and private contracts. This judgment highlights the importance of civil suits in resolving contractual disputes, especially when land is acquired

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition impact on earnest money forfeiture in property sale agreements: Ramesh Chand vs. Tanmay Developers (2017) INSC 370 (26 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Market Expansion Despite Procedural Lapses: Special Agricultural Produce Market Committee vs. N. Krishnappa (2017) INSC 372 (17 April 2017)

Can a land acquisition be upheld even with procedural errors? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning land acquisition for a market expansion. The Court acknowledged procedural infirmities but upheld the acquisition, emphasizing the larger public interest. This case highlights the balance between procedural compliance and public benefit in land

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Market Expansion Despite Procedural Lapses: Special Agricultural Produce Market Committee vs. N. Krishnappa (2017) INSC 372 (17 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act: Applicability of 2013 Act (25 January 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 58 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., R.K. Agrawal, J. Can the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (New LA Act) be applied when land is acquired under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (KIAD

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act: Applicability of 2013 Act (25 January 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation: Om Parkash & Ors. vs. State of Haryana (2016)

Can a court enhance land compensation when the Land Acquisition Collector has undervalued the land? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a case concerning land acquisition in Haryana. This judgment clarifies the principles for determining fair compensation for land acquired by the government. The Supreme Court bench consisted of Justices Kurian

Supreme Court enhances land compensation: Om Parkash & Ors. vs. State of Haryana (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Power House Acquisition: N.D. Sharma vs. Union of India (2016)

Can land owners receive equal compensation when their land is acquired for the same project? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case concerning land acquisition for a power house. The Court ruled that landowners should receive the same compensation as their neighbors if their land is similarly situated. This decision

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation for Power House Acquisition: N.D. Sharma vs. Union of India (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Possession Decree After Land Acquisition: Market Committee Hodal vs. Sukhdevi (2015)

Date of the Judgment: 15th October, 2015 Citation: Not Available Judges: Anil R. Dave, J. and Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. Can a civil court decree possession of land when that land has already been acquired by the government? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case where a lower court had

Supreme Court Overturns Possession Decree After Land Acquisition: Market Committee Hodal vs. Sukhdevi (2015) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Auction of Metallurgical Coke: LMJ International Ltd. vs. Dankuni Steels Limited (2017)

Can a court accept a bid in an auction if the offered price, after deducting taxes, falls below the reserve price? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case concerning the sale of metallurgical coke. This case highlights the importance of ensuring fair value in court-ordered auctions. The judgment was delivered

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Auction of Metallurgical Coke: LMJ International Ltd. vs. Dankuni Steels Limited (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Land Acquisition Quashing: TNHB vs. Saraswathy (2015)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the quashing of land acquisition proceedings at the instance of some landowners nullifies the entire acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Chairman & Managing Director, TNHB & Anr vs. S. Saraswathy & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 11th May 2015 Date of the Judgment: 11th May 2015 Citation: Not Available in the

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Land Acquisition Quashing: TNHB vs. Saraswathy (2015) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Resumption of Land for Failure to Build Educational Complex: Raunaq Education Foundation vs. State of Haryana (2014)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State can resume land allotted to an educational foundation for failing to fulfill the conditions of allotment. CASE TYPE: Land Resumption. Case Name: Raunaq Education Foundation vs. State of Haryana. Judgment Date: 14th October 2014 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 14th October 2014. Citation: 2014 INSC 636. Judges: Justice V. Gopala

Supreme Court Upholds Resumption of Land for Failure to Build Educational Complex: Raunaq Education Foundation vs. State of Haryana (2014) Read Post »

Scroll to Top