Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories in Review Petition: Arun Dev Upadhyaya vs. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. (2023) INSC 610 (5 July 2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 46, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XLVII Rule 1, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Review Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories Date of the Judgment: 5 July 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 610 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Vikram Nath, J. Can a foreign arbitral award be enforced against individuals or entities not directly party to the arbitration agreement? The Supreme Court of India, in this review […]

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories in Review Petition: Arun Dev Upadhyaya vs. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. (2023) INSC 610 (5 July 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Review of Cross-Objections: Dheeraj Singh vs. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & Ors. (2023) INSC 609 (04 July 2023)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order 41 Rule 22, Cross-Objections, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Review of Cross-Objections Date of the Judgment: 04 July 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 609 Judges: Krishna Murari, J. and Bela M. Trivedi, J. Can a High Court ignore cross-objections filed by a party in an appeal? The Supreme Court recently addressed this critical question in a land acquisition

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Review of Cross-Objections: Dheeraj Singh vs. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & Ors. (2023) INSC 609 (04 July 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Fresh Adjudication: Dheeraj Singh vs. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (2023)

/ Appellate Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 22, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Fresh Adjudication: Dheeraj Singh vs. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in not considering the cross-objections filed by the appellants in a land acquisition case. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Dheeraj Singh vs. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & Ors.

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Fresh Adjudication: Dheeraj Singh vs. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 475 (18 May 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court settles the Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 475 (18 May 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can invoke Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land

Supreme Court settles the Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 475 (18 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition rights of subsequent purchasers: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 558 (18 May 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can invoke Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 to claim that the acquisition has lapsed. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition rights of subsequent purchasers: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 558 (18 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Acts: C.S. Gopalakrishnan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 254(2), Dinesh Maheshwari, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Sanjay Kumar, Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Acts

Supreme Court Upholds Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Acts: C.S. Gopalakrishnan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Tamil Nadu land acquisition laws are discriminatory and arbitrary compared to the Central Land Acquisition Act. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law Case Name: C.S. Gopalakrishnan ETC. vs. The State of Tamil Nadu & Others [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Acts: C.S. Gopalakrishnan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse for Subsequent Purchasers: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narendra Kumar Jain (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse for Subsequent Purchasers: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narendra Kumar Jain (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can challenge acquisition proceedings and claim a lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse for Subsequent Purchasers: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narendra Kumar Jain (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Cases for Fresh Review: State of Haryana vs. Hira Singh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 101-A, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Cases: State of Haryana vs. Hira Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisitions lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation isn’t paid and possession is not taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The State

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Cases for Fresh Review: State of Haryana vs. Hira Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Cases for Fresh Review: State of Haryana vs. Hira Singh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 101-A, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Cases: State of Haryana vs. Hira Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisitions lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, when compensation hasn’t been paid and physical possession remains with the original owners. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Cases for Fresh Review: State of Haryana vs. Hira Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 30/31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Possession, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if either possession is taken or compensation is paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 30/31, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if either possession is taken or compensation is paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes land acquisition for Vedanta University: Anil Agarwal Foundation loses appeal (2023)

/ Companies Act, 1956, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition (Companies) Rules, 1963, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Public Company, Public Interest Litigation

Supreme Court quashes land acquisition for Vedanta University: Anil Agarwal Foundation loses appeal (2023) Date of the Judgment: April 12, 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: M.R. Shah, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can a private company, masquerading as a public entity, acquire vast tracts of agricultural land for a project that doesn’t yet exist? The Supreme

Supreme Court quashes land acquisition for Vedanta University: Anil Agarwal Foundation loses appeal (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top