Land Acquisition Act with Section 18

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Munusamy vs. Land Acquisition Officer (29 September 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act with Section 6, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Munusamy vs. Land Acquisition Officer (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of Fair Market Value for Land Acquisition Compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Munusamy vs. The Land Acquisition Officer. Judgment Date: 29 September 2021 Date of the Judgment: 29 September 2021 Citation: [Not Provided in Source] Judges: M. R. […]

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Munusamy vs. Land Acquisition Officer (29 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for NOIDA: Ajai Pal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (23 September 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act with Section 6, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for NOIDA: Ajai Pal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (2021) Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2021 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 5738-5739 of 2021, Civil Appeal No. 5740 of 2021 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., A.S. Bopanna, J. Can a court rectify a previous compensation

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for NOIDA: Ajai Pal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (23 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order due to delay in challenging land acquisition: Haryana State Handloom vs. Jain Shool Society (2003)

/ H. K. Sema, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 17, Land Acquisition Act with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, S. N. Variava

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 29th October 2003 Citation: Appeal (civil) 2744 of 2002 Judges: S. N. Variava J, H. K. Sema Can a delay of 22 years in filing a writ petition challenging a land acquisition be excused if the land was not used for its intended purpose? The Supreme Court addressed this critical

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order due to delay in challenging land acquisition: Haryana State Handloom vs. Jain Shool Society (2003) Read Post »

Scroll to Top