Land Acquisition Act with Section 4

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation: Harpal Singh vs. State of Punjab (2022)

/ Compensation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition in Punjab LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Harpal Singh and Anr. Etc. Etc. Versus State of Punjab Etc. Etc. [Judgment Date]: 23 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2022 Citation: Harpal Singh and Anr. Etc. Etc. […]

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation: Harpal Singh vs. State of Punjab (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: Special Land Acquisition Officer vs. N. Savitha (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act with Section 6, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: Special Land Acquisition Officer vs. N. Savitha (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value in land acquisition cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Special Land Acquisition Officer and Ors. vs. N. Savitha [Judgment Date]: 22 March 2022 Date of the Judgment: 22 March 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: Special Land Acquisition Officer vs. N. Savitha (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Munusamy vs. Land Acquisition Officer (29 September 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act with Section 6, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Munusamy vs. Land Acquisition Officer (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of Fair Market Value for Land Acquisition Compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Munusamy vs. The Land Acquisition Officer. Judgment Date: 29 September 2021 Date of the Judgment: 29 September 2021 Citation: [Not Provided in Source] Judges: M. R.

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Munusamy vs. Land Acquisition Officer (29 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for NOIDA: Ajai Pal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (23 September 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act with Section 6, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for NOIDA: Ajai Pal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (2021) Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2021 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 5738-5739 of 2021, Civil Appeal No. 5740 of 2021 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., A.S. Bopanna, J. Can a court rectify a previous compensation

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for NOIDA: Ajai Pal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (23 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Appeal Due to Delay and Merits: Bihari vs. State of U.P. (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Appeal, Civil Law, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Special Leave Petition

Supreme Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Appeal Due to Delay and Merits: Bihari vs. State of U.P. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a special leave petition challenging the enhancement of land acquisition compensation should be dismissed due to significant delay and lack of merit. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Bihari (Dead) through Lrs. and others

Supreme Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Appeal Due to Delay and Merits: Bihari vs. State of U.P. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation, denies delay benefits: Devender Singh vs State of Haryana (20 April 2018)

/ Compensation, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act with Section 6, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha

Supreme Court enhances land compensation, denies delay benefits: Devender Singh vs State of Haryana (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition and the impact of delays on statutory benefits. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Devender Singh vs State of Haryana & Ors. Judgment Date: 20 April 2018 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court enhances land compensation, denies delay benefits: Devender Singh vs State of Haryana (20 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order due to delay in challenging land acquisition: Haryana State Handloom vs. Jain Shool Society (2003)

/ H. K. Sema, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 17, Land Acquisition Act with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, S. N. Variava

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 29th October 2003 Citation: Appeal (civil) 2744 of 2002 Judges: S. N. Variava J, H. K. Sema Can a delay of 22 years in filing a writ petition challenging a land acquisition be excused if the land was not used for its intended purpose? The Supreme Court addressed this critical

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order due to delay in challenging land acquisition: Haryana State Handloom vs. Jain Shool Society (2003) Read Post »

Scroll to Top