Land Acquisition Law

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013: Delhi Development Authority vs. Krishan Lal Arora & Ors. (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 24(2), M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: DDA vs. Krishan Lal Arora (2022) Date of the Judgment: 02 November 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 7960 of 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed solely because compensation wasn’t paid […]

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013: Delhi Development Authority vs. Krishan Lal Arora & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagwat Singh (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Land Acquisition, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagwat Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding the lapse of land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law Case

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagwat Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Compensation Under 2013 Act: Bharat Petroleum vs. Nisar Ahmed (2022)

/ General Clauses Act, 1897, General Clauses Act, 1897 with Section 6, Jammu & Kashmir State Land Acquisition Act, 1990, Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 24, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Compensation Under 2013 Act: Bharat Petroleum vs. Nisar Ahmed (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 to acquisitions initiated under the Jammu & Kashmir State Land Acquisition Act, 1990. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Bharat Petroleum

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Compensation Under 2013 Act: Bharat Petroleum vs. Nisar Ahmed (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Fair Price Shop License Cancellation: Ram Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (28 September 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, C.T. Ravikumar, Civil Procedure, Judges, Natural Justice, Necessary Party, Right to be Heard

Fair Price Shop Allotment: Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of License (28 September 2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 September 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 459 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a fair price shop license be canceled if the dealer engages in malpractices? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question

Supreme Court Upholds Fair Price Shop License Cancellation: Ram Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (28 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI’s Right to Withhold Confidential Documents in Inquiry: Kavi Arora vs. SEBI (2022)

/ A. S. Bopanna, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Natural Justice, Regulatory Adjudication, Right to be Heard, SEBI Act, 1992, Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1956, Securities Law

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI’s Right to Withhold Confidential Documents in Inquiry: Kavi Arora vs. SEBI (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is obligated to disclose all documents relied upon in a show cause notice, including those considered confidential, to the noticee during an inquiry. CASE TYPE: Securities Law, Regulatory

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI’s Right to Withhold Confidential Documents in Inquiry: Kavi Arora vs. SEBI (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land compensation under National Highways Act: National Highways Authority of India vs. Sri P. Nagaraju (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 31(3), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Indira Banerjee, Judges, National Highways Act, 1956, National Highways Act, 1956 with Section 3G(7)(a), Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 28

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Compensation Under National Highways Act: NHAI vs. Nagaraju (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition under the National Highways Act, 1956 (NH Act) and the applicability of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR Act, 2013). CASE TYPE: Land

Supreme Court clarifies land compensation under National Highways Act: National Highways Authority of India vs. Sri P. Nagaraju (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Agra Development Authority vs. Anek Singh (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Compensation in Land Acquisition, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings, M. R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Section 24, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Agra Development Authority vs. Anek Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not directly paid to landowners, despite the amount being deposited with the Land Acquisition Officer and possession taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Agra Development Authority, Agra vs. Anek Singh and others

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Agra Development Authority vs. Anek Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24 of the 2013 Act: Ayodhya Faizabad Development Authority vs. Ram Newaj (20 May 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 24, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24 of the 2013 Act: Ayodhya Faizabad Development Authority vs. Ram Newaj (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is deposited in the Treasury but

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24 of the 2013 Act: Ayodhya Faizabad Development Authority vs. Ram Newaj (20 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles land acquisition dispute: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhim Sain Goel (2022)

/ Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, National Highways Act, 1956, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court settles land acquisition dispute: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhim Sain Goel (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land acquisition proceeding lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if the acquiring authority was prevented from taking possession due to court orders obtained

Supreme Court settles land acquisition dispute: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhim Sain Goel (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (20 January 2022)

/ Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 with Section 36(1), Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 applies to land acquisitions made under the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (20 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (20 January 2022)

/ Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 with Section 36(1), Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Legislation by Incorporation, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (2022) Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 782 Judges: S. Abdul Nazeer, J. and Sanjiv Khanna, J. Can the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) acquire land using the old Land Acquisition Act of

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Land Acquisition Act to Bangalore Development Authority: Bangalore Development Authority vs. State of Karnataka (20 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court dismisses contempt petition in land acquisition case: Soorajmull Nagarmull vs. Brijesh Mehrotra (2021)

/ Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 11, Land Acquisition Law with Section 64, R. Subhash Reddy, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court dismisses contempt petition in land acquisition case: Soorajmull Nagarmull vs. Brijesh Mehrotra (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the respondents wilfully violated the Supreme Court’s directions regarding land acquisition compensation. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court / Land Acquisition Case Name: M/s. Soorajmull Nagarmull vs. Sri Brijesh Mehrotra & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 14 December 2021 Introduction

Supreme Court dismisses contempt petition in land acquisition case: Soorajmull Nagarmull vs. Brijesh Mehrotra (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top