Right to be Heard

Supreme Court quashes land acquisition due to lack of notice: U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad vs. Chandra Shekhar (2024) INSC 210

Supreme Court quashes land acquisition due to lack of notice: U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad vs. Chandra Shekhar (2024) INSC 210 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the acquisition of land by the U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad is valid if the tenure holders were not given an opportunity to object to the acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition […]

Supreme Court quashes land acquisition due to lack of notice: U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad vs. Chandra Shekhar (2024) INSC 210 Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order for Lack of Due Process in Environmental Case

Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order for Lack of Due Process in Environmental Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) can pass an order without issuing notice to the affected parties. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law. Case Name: Veena Gupta & Anr. vs. Central Pollution Control Board & Ors. Judgment Date: January 30, 2024

Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order for Lack of Due Process in Environmental Case Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Fair Price Shop License Cancellation: Ram Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (28 September 2022)

Fair Price Shop Allotment: Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of License (28 September 2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 September 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 459 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a fair price shop license be canceled if the dealer engages in malpractices? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question

Supreme Court Upholds Fair Price Shop License Cancellation: Ram Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (28 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI’s Right to Withhold Confidential Documents in Inquiry: Kavi Arora vs. SEBI (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI’s Right to Withhold Confidential Documents in Inquiry: Kavi Arora vs. SEBI (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is obligated to disclose all documents relied upon in a show cause notice, including those considered confidential, to the noticee during an inquiry. CASE TYPE: Securities Law, Regulatory

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI’s Right to Withhold Confidential Documents in Inquiry: Kavi Arora vs. SEBI (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Reversion Order for Town Planner Due to Lack of Hearing: Aurangabad Municipal Corporation vs. Jayant Kharwadkar (2019)

Supreme Court Quashes Reversion Order for Town Planner Due to Lack of Hearing: Aurangabad Municipal Corporation vs. Jayant Kharwadkar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a municipal corporation can revert an employee from their promoted position without providing them an opportunity to be heard. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Aurangabad Municipal Corporation vs. Jayant S/O Sarvottamrao

Supreme Court Quashes Reversion Order for Town Planner Due to Lack of Hearing: Aurangabad Municipal Corporation vs. Jayant Kharwadkar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Industrial Dispute for Fresh Hearing: Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Dealers Association vs. Sanyojak Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Mazdoor Sangh (2019)

Supreme Court Remands Industrial Dispute for Fresh Hearing: Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Dealers Association vs. Sanyojak Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Mazdoor Sangh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an ex-parte award by the Industrial Tribunal should be set aside and the matter remanded for a fresh hearing when the affected party was not given an opportunity to

Supreme Court Remands Industrial Dispute for Fresh Hearing: Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Dealers Association vs. Sanyojak Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Mazdoor Sangh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Order for Not Hearing All Parties in Land Encroachment Case: Johra & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (2018) INSC 1025 (03 December 2018)

Supreme Court Sets Aside Order for Not Hearing All Parties in Land Encroachment Case Date of the Judgment: 03 December 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 1025 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can a court issue orders affecting parties without giving them a chance to be heard? The Supreme Court recently addressed this fundamental

Supreme Court Sets Aside Order for Not Hearing All Parties in Land Encroachment Case: Johra & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (2018) INSC 1025 (03 December 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Society’s Right to be Heard in Land Dispute: Gopal Nagar Cooperative vs. Mohd. Aslam (2018) INSC 849 (27 September 2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Society’s Right to be Heard in Land Dispute Date of the Judgment: 27 September 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 849 Judges: R. Banumathi, J. and Indira Banerjee, J. Can a court set aside a decree passed without giving a party a fair chance to present its case? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Upholds Society’s Right to be Heard in Land Dispute: Gopal Nagar Cooperative vs. Mohd. Aslam (2018) INSC 849 (27 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Hearing: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank vs. Bhagirath Singh (2018)

Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Hearing: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank vs. Bhagirath Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can pass an order against a party without providing them an opportunity to be heard. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank Limited vs. Bhagirath Singh (Dead) Through L. Rs. [Judgment

Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Hearing: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank vs. Bhagirath Singh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Hearing in Land Dispute: Ashim Ranjan Das vs. Shibu Bodhak (2018)

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Hearing in Land Dispute: Ashim Ranjan Das vs. Shibu Bodhak (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land dispute case should be re-heard by the Land Tribunal for violation of natural justice CASE TYPE: Land Dispute Case Name: Ashim Ranjan Das (D) BY LRS. vs. Shibu Bodhak & ORS. [Judgment Date]: April 05,

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Hearing in Land Dispute: Ashim Ranjan Das vs. Shibu Bodhak (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Show Cause Notice Before Termination in Service Matter: Lakshmi Narain Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018)

Supreme Court Directs Show Cause Notice Before Termination in Service Matter: Lakshmi Narain Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Date of the Judgment: April 2, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 266 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Navin Sinha, J. Can an employee be terminated from service without being given a chance to explain their case? The

Supreme Court Directs Show Cause Notice Before Termination in Service Matter: Lakshmi Narain Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Case Due to Lack of Notice: Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Joy Kaliyavumkal (2018)

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Case Due to Lack of Notice: Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Joy Kaliyavumkal (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) can proceed ex-parte without ensuring proper notice to the parties. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case Name: M/s Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Case Due to Lack of Notice: Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Joy Kaliyavumkal (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top