Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 21

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) vs. Yunus & Ors. (03 February 2022)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 28A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 20, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 21, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Clarifies: Lok Adalat Awards Cannot Trigger Land Compensation Redetermination Under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an award passed by a Lok Adalat under Section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 can be the basis for redetermination of compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, […]

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) vs. Yunus & Ors. (03 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies remedy against Lok Adalat awards: Bhargavi Constructions vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy (2017)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 7 Rule 11(d), Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 141, Judges, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 21, Order 7 Rule 11(d), R.K. Agrawal, Writ Jurisdiction

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil suit is maintainable to challenge an award passed by the Lok Adalat or if the only remedy is a writ petition. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Bhargavi Constructions & Anr. vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy & Ors. [Judgment Date]: September 7, 2017 Date of the Judgment: September 7, 2017 Citation: (2017)

Supreme Court clarifies remedy against Lok Adalat awards: Bhargavi Constructions vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top