Limitation Act 1963

Supreme Court Reverses Course on Specific Performance in Property Dispute: Siddamsetty Infra Projects Wins (2024)

/ Limitation Act 1963, Limitation Act 1963 with Article 54, Specific Relief Act 1963, Specific Relief Act 1963 with Section 10, Specific Relief Act 1963 with Section 16(c), Transfer of Property Act 1882, Transfer of Property Act 1882 with Section 52

Supreme Court Reverses Course on Specific Performance in Property Dispute: Siddamsetty Infra Projects Wins (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of immovable property was barred by limitation and whether specific performance should be granted. CASE TYPE: Civil (Specific Performance, Property Law, Contract Law) Case Name: M/s Siddamsetty […]

Supreme Court Reverses Course on Specific Performance in Property Dispute: Siddamsetty Infra Projects Wins (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for appeals under IBC: Sanket Kumar Agarwal vs. APG Logistics (2023)

/ Appeals, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 61, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Limitation Act 1963, Limitation Act 1963 with Section 12, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 with Rule 22, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 with Rule 3

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for appeals under IBC: Sanket Kumar Agarwal vs. APG Logistics (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct calculation of the limitation period for filing appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Sanket Kumar Agarwal & Anr vs. APG Logistics Private Limited [Judgment Date]: 1

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for appeals under IBC: Sanket Kumar Agarwal vs. APG Logistics (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Selection Grade Benefit: Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation vs. Sadhu Singh (2022)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Limitation Act 1963, Limitation Act 1963 with Article 137, Selection Grade Benefits, Service Law, Service Law with Satisfactory Service Record, Surya Kant

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation vs. Sadhu Singh: Supreme Court Denies Selection Grade Benefit Due to Untainted Service Record (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee with a blemished service record is entitled to Selection Grade benefits and whether a suit filed seven years after retirement is barred by limitation. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Denies Selection Grade Benefit: Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation vs. Sadhu Singh (2022) Read Post »

Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Supreme Court rules in favor of Homebuyers in Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022)

/ AS Bopanna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 24A, Consumer Rights, Continuing Cause of Action, Deficiency in Service, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Limitation Act 1963, Limitation Act 1963 with Section 22, Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act 1963, Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act 1963 with Section 6, Promoter's Obligations

Supreme Court on Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the failure to obtain an occupancy certificate constitutes a continuing cause of action in a consumer dispute, allowing for claims beyond the standard limitation period. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case

Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Supreme Court rules in favor of Homebuyers in Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top