Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Supreme Court rules in favor of Homebuyers in Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022)

/ AS Bopanna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 24A, Consumer Rights, Continuing Cause of Action, Deficiency in Service, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Limitation Act 1963, Limitation Act 1963 with Section 22, Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act 1963, Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act 1963 with Section 6, Promoter's Obligations

Supreme Court on Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the failure to obtain an occupancy certificate constitutes a continuing cause of action in a consumer dispute, allowing for claims beyond the standard limitation period. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case […]

Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Supreme Court rules in favor of Homebuyers in Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022) Read Post »