Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (20 December 2024)

/ Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order XXIII Rule 3A, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 3

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for declaration of ownership and possession of land is barred by limitation when the plaintiff’s predecessors did not challenge prior registered sale deeds and court decrees for several decades. […]

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (20 December 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024)

/ Burden of Proof, Donation of Land, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 110, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Ownership, Possession, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for possession of land is maintainable when the land was donated to the State for a public purpose and the suit is filed after a long period of possession by the State.

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for declaration suits in property disputes: Vasantha vs. Rajalakshmi (2024) INSC 109 (13 February 2024)

/ Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 27, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 34, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 19

Supreme Court on Limitation and Declaratory Suits in Property Disputes Date of the Judgment: 13 February 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 109 Judges: Hrishikesh Roy, J. and Sanjay Karol, J. Can a suit for declaration of property rights be maintained without seeking possession, especially when limitation periods have expired? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for declaration suits in property disputes: Vasantha vs. Rajalakshmi (2024) INSC 109 (13 February 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Suit as Time-Barred in Property Dispute: Sukhbiri Devi vs. Union of India (29 September 2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order VII, Rule 11, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XIV, Rule 2, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 136, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Suit as Time-Barred in Property Dispute: Sukhbiri Devi vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for declaration of co-ownership of property is barred by limitation when the suit is filed more than three years after the knowledge of a registered relinquishment deed. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Suit as Time-Barred in Property Dispute: Sukhbiri Devi vs. Union of India (29 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court Decision in Land Dispute: State of Telangana vs. B. Rangaswamy (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Section 80, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court Decision in Land Dispute: State of Telangana vs. B. Rangaswamy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Dispute over land ownership and identity based on survey numbers. CASE TYPE: Civil Land Dispute Case Name: The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Telangana & Anr. vs. B. Rangaswamy (Dead) By Lrs. & Ors. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court Decision in Land Dispute: State of Telangana vs. B. Rangaswamy (2022) Read Post »

Limitation in Property Disputes: Supreme Court Divided on Plaint Rejection in Saranpal Kaur Anand vs. Praduman Singh Chandhok (28 March 2022)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11(d), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XII Rule 6, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 17, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 3, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Addresses Limitation in Property Dispute: Saranpal Kaur Anand vs. Praduman Singh Chandhok (2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 March 2022 The Supreme Court of India heard a case regarding a property dispute where the main issue was whether the suit was filed within the time limit set by law. The case, *Saranpal Kaur

Limitation in Property Disputes: Supreme Court Divided on Plaint Rejection in Saranpal Kaur Anand vs. Praduman Singh Chandhok (28 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Relinquishment Deed by Karta in Joint Hindu Family Property Dispute: M.R. Vinoda vs. M.S. Susheelamma (2021)

/ Hindu Law, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Joint Hindu Family Property, Judges, Karta's Powers, L. Nageswara Rao, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 109, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds Relinquishment Deed by Karta in Joint Hindu Family Property Dispute: M.R. Vinoda vs. M.S. Susheelamma (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Karta (head of a Hindu family) can execute a valid relinquishment deed on behalf of his branch of the family, including the interest of minor coparceners, and the limitation period for challenging

Supreme Court Upholds Relinquishment Deed by Karta in Joint Hindu Family Property Dispute: M.R. Vinoda vs. M.S. Susheelamma (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed: Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (2020) INSC 377

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Indu Malhotra, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59, Rejection of Plaint, Sale of Property, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 54

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed: Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (2020) INSC 377 Date of the Judgment: July 09, 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 377 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can a sale deed be cancelled years after its execution, merely on the ground that the full

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed: Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (2020) INSC 377 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Rejects Oral Gift Claim in Property Dispute: Jamila Begum vs. Shami Mohd. (2018)

/ Indira Banerjee, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59, Mohammedan Law, Mortgage, Oral Gift, R. Banumathi, Sale Deed, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 60

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Rejects Oral Gift Claim in Property Dispute: Jamila Begum vs. Shami Mohd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of a sale deed versus an oral gift in a property dispute. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Law. Case Name: Jamila Begum (D) Thr. Lrs. vs. Shami Mohd. (D) Thr. Lrs. & Another. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Rejects Oral Gift Claim in Property Dispute: Jamila Begum vs. Shami Mohd. (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top