Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (20 December 2024)

/ Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order XXIII Rule 3A, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 3

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for declaration of ownership and possession of land is barred by limitation when the plaintiff’s predecessors did not challenge prior registered sale deeds and court decrees for several decades. […]

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (20 December 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court restricts amendment of pleadings at fag end of trial: Basavaraj vs. Indira (2024) INSC 151

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXIII Rule 3, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59

Supreme Court on Amendment of Pleadings: Basavaraj vs. Indira (2024) INSC 151 Date of the Judgment: February 29, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 151 Judges: C.T. Ravikumar, J., Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a party amend their pleadings at the fag end of a trial to introduce a new claim, especially when a previous compromise decree exists?

Supreme Court restricts amendment of pleadings at fag end of trial: Basavaraj vs. Indira (2024) INSC 151 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed: Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (2020) INSC 377

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Indu Malhotra, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59, Rejection of Plaint, Sale of Property, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 54

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed: Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (2020) INSC 377 Date of the Judgment: July 09, 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 377 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can a sale deed be cancelled years after its execution, merely on the ground that the full

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed: Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (2020) INSC 377 Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Gift Deed After 22 Years: Raghwendra Sharan Singh vs. Ram Prasanna Singh (2019) INSC 184

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 7 Rule 11, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59, M. R. Shah, Rejection of Plaint

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Gift Deed After 22 Years: Raghwendra Sharan Singh vs. Ram Prasanna Singh (2019) INSC 184 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit challenging a registered gift deed, filed 22 years after its execution, is barred by limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: Raghwendra

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Gift Deed After 22 Years: Raghwendra Sharan Singh vs. Ram Prasanna Singh (2019) INSC 184 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Rejects Oral Gift Claim in Property Dispute: Jamila Begum vs. Shami Mohd. (2018)

/ Indira Banerjee, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59, Mohammedan Law, Mortgage, Oral Gift, R. Banumathi, Sale Deed, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 60

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Rejects Oral Gift Claim in Property Dispute: Jamila Begum vs. Shami Mohd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of a sale deed versus an oral gift in a property dispute. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Law. Case Name: Jamila Begum (D) Thr. Lrs. vs. Shami Mohd. (D) Thr. Lrs. & Another. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Rejects Oral Gift Claim in Property Dispute: Jamila Begum vs. Shami Mohd. (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top