Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (20 December 2024)

/ Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order XXIII Rule 3A, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 3

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for declaration of ownership and possession of land is barred by limitation when the plaintiff’s predecessors did not challenge prior registered sale deeds and court decrees for several decades. […]

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (20 December 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Citizen’s Property Rights Against State’s Adverse Possession Claim: State of Haryana vs. Amin Lal (2024) INSC 875 (19 November 2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VIII Rule 5, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 110, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 35, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Property Law, State and Property Rights

Supreme Court Upholds Citizen’s Property Rights Against State’s Adverse Possession Claim Date of the Judgment: 19 November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 875 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. Can a state claim ownership of a citizen’s property through adverse possession? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a case

Supreme Court Upholds Citizen’s Property Rights Against State’s Adverse Possession Claim: State of Haryana vs. Amin Lal (2024) INSC 875 (19 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Gift Deed Revocation under Transfer of Property Act: N. Thajudeen vs. Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board (2024)

/ Gift Deed, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Revocation of Gift, Section 126, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Supreme Court Clarifies Gift Deed Revocation Under Transfer of Property Act: N. Thajudeen vs. Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a gift deed, once validly executed and accepted, can be revoked, and the implications of Section 126 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 on such revocations. CASE TYPE: Civil

Supreme Court clarifies Gift Deed Revocation under Transfer of Property Act: N. Thajudeen vs. Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Title Based on Registered Sale Deed, Dismissing Adverse Possession Claim: Neelam Gupta & Ors. vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. (2024)

/ Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 4, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 11, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Transfer of Property Act, Transfer of Property Act with Section 54, Transfer of Property Act with Section 6(h), Transfer of Property Act with Section 7

Supreme Court Upholds Title Based on Registered Sale Deed, Dismissing Adverse Possession Claim: Neelam Gupta & Ors. vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. (2024) Date of the Judgment: 14 October 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 769 Judges: C.T. Ravikumar, J., Sanjay Kumar, J. Can a claim of adverse possession succeed against a title established through a

Supreme Court Upholds Title Based on Registered Sale Deed, Dismissing Adverse Possession Claim: Neelam Gupta & Ors. vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024)

/ Burden of Proof, Donation of Land, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 110, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Ownership, Possession, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for possession of land is maintainable when the land was donated to the State for a public purpose and the suit is filed after a long period of possession by the State.

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings Against Adverse Possession Claim: M. Radheshyamlal vs. V. Sandhya (2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Civil Law, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings Against Adverse Possession Claim: M. Radheshyamlal vs. V. Sandhya (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the plaintiff has successfully established a claim of adverse possession over the suit property. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: M. Radheshyamlal vs. V. Sandhya and Anr. Etc. [Judgment Date]: March 18, 2024 Date

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings Against Adverse Possession Claim: M. Radheshyamlal vs. V. Sandhya (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for declaration suits in property disputes: Vasantha vs. Rajalakshmi (2024) INSC 109 (13 February 2024)

/ Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 27, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 34, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 19

Supreme Court on Limitation and Declaratory Suits in Property Disputes Date of the Judgment: 13 February 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 109 Judges: Hrishikesh Roy, J. and Sanjay Karol, J. Can a suit for declaration of property rights be maintained without seeking possession, especially when limitation periods have expired? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for declaration suits in property disputes: Vasantha vs. Rajalakshmi (2024) INSC 109 (13 February 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Adverse Possession over Waqf Property: Sabir Ali Khan vs. Syed Mohd. Ahmad Ali Khan (2023)

/ Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 96, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 27, Uttar Pradesh Muslim Waqf Act, 1960, Uttar Pradesh Muslim Waqf Act, 1960 with Section 49A, Uttar Pradesh Muslim Waqf Act, 1960 with Section 69, Waqf Act, 1995, Waqf Act, 1995 with Section 107, Waqf Act, 1995 with Section 52

Supreme Court Upholds Adverse Possession over Waqf Property: Sabir Ali Khan vs. Syed Mohd. Ahmad Ali Khan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a beneficiary of a Waqf can acquire title to Waqf property through adverse possession. CASE TYPE: Waqf Law, Property Law, Limitation Law. Case Name: Sabir Ali Khan vs. Syed Mohd. Ahmad Ali Khan and

Supreme Court Upholds Adverse Possession over Waqf Property: Sabir Ali Khan vs. Syed Mohd. Ahmad Ali Khan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Landlords Seeking Possession from Tenants: Nand Ram vs. Jagdish Prasad (2020)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Leases of Immovable Property, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 67, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 111, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 116

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Landlords Seeking Possession from Tenants: Nand Ram vs. Jagdish Prasad (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the applicable limitation period for a landlord to recover possession from a tenant after the lease expires. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Law Case Name: Nand Ram (D) Through Lrs. & Ors. vs. Jagdish Prasad

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Landlords Seeking Possession from Tenants: Nand Ram vs. Jagdish Prasad (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dargah’s Land Rights: Sopanrao vs. Syed Mehmood (2019)

/ Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order XLI Rule 27, Deepak Gupta, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Management Rights, N. V. Ramana, Property Law, Religious Property, Suit for Possession

Supreme Court Upholds Dargah’s Land Rights: Sopanrao vs. Syed Mehmood (2019) Date of the Judgment: July 03, 2019 Citation: Sopanrao & Anr. vs. Syed Mehmood & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 4478 of 2007 Judges: N. V. Ramana, Deepak Gupta, and Indira Banerjee, JJ. Can a civil court decide on the management rights of a religious

Supreme Court Upholds Dargah’s Land Rights: Sopanrao vs. Syed Mehmood (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for challenging property transfer by a guardian: Murugan vs. Kesava Gounder (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 8, Indian Succession Act, 1925, Indian Succession Act, 1925 with Section 119, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 60, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65

Supreme Court on Limitation for challenging property transfer by a guardian: Murugan vs. Kesava Gounder (2019) Date of the Judgment: 25 February 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 171 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., K.M. Joseph, J. Can a minor’s property sale by a guardian be challenged after a certain period? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for challenging property transfer by a guardian: Murugan vs. Kesava Gounder (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Decision on Limitation in Property Dispute: Ghewarchand vs. Mahendra Singh (20 September 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 145, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Decision on Limitation in Property Dispute: Ghewarchand vs. Mahendra Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct limitation period for a suit involving declaration of title, injunction, and possession of property. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Ghewarchand & Ors. vs. M/s Mahendra Singh & Ors. Judgment Date: 20 September

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Decision on Limitation in Property Dispute: Ghewarchand vs. Mahendra Singh (20 September 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top