Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown: N.Rajendran vs. S.Valli (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Family Courts Act, 1984, Family Courts Act, 1984 with Section 19, Family Courts Act, 1984 with Section 20, Grounds for Divorce, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13(1)(ia), Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 15, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown: N.Rajendran vs. S.Valli (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a marriage can be dissolved on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown, even when one party does not consent, and the applicability of the Limitation Act to appeals under the Family Courts Act. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Law, Family Law Case Name: N.Rajendran […]

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown: N.Rajendran vs. S.Valli (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for IBC Appeals: Nagarajan vs. SKS Ispat (22 October 2021)

/ Appeals under IBC, BV Nagarathna, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 420, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 421, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 238, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 61, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 12, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for IBC Appeals: Nagarajan vs. SKS Ispat (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the limitation period for appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: V Nagarajan vs. SKS Ispat and Power Ltd. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 22 October 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 22

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for IBC Appeals: Nagarajan vs. SKS Ispat (22 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Condonation of Delay in Divorce Appeals Under Special Marriage Act: Arunoday Singh vs. Lee Anne Elton (2021)

/ Appeals, Divorce, Family Courts Act, 1984, Family Courts Act, 1984 with Section 19, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Special Marriage Act, 1954, Special Marriage Act, 1954 with Section 39, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Condonation of Delay in Divorce Appeals Under Special Marriage Act: Arunoday Singh vs. Lee Anne Elton (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the delay in filing an appeal from a decree passed by a Family Court under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. CASE

Supreme Court Clarifies Condonation of Delay in Divorce Appeals Under Special Marriage Act: Arunoday Singh vs. Lee Anne Elton (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Section 37 Appeals under Arbitration Act: Government of Maharashtra vs. Borse Brothers (2021)

/ Appeals from Arbitral Orders, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, B.R. Gavai, Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 13, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, R.F. Nariman

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Section 37 Appeals under Arbitration Act: Government of Maharashtra vs. Borse Brothers (2021) Date of the Judgment: March 19, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 149 Judges: R.F. Nariman, J., B.R. Gavai, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can delays in filing appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 be

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Section 37 Appeals under Arbitration Act: Government of Maharashtra vs. Borse Brothers (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act to revisions under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005

/ Arun Mishra, B.R. Gavai, Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 with Section 48, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Limitation Act in Himachal Pradesh VAT Revisions LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can condone delays in filing revisions under Section 48 of the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: Superintending Engineer/ Dehar Power House Circle Bhakra Beas Management Board (PW) Slapper &

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act to revisions under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation Period for Possession Suits Based on Declaratory Decrees: Mohinder Singh vs. Paramjit Singh (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Dipak Misra, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29, Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920, Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920 with Article 2, Suits Related to Ancestral Property

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation Period for Possession Suits Based on Declaratory Decrees: Mohinder Singh vs. Paramjit Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the starting point of the limitation period for filing a suit for possession of ancestral property after obtaining a declaratory decree. CASE TYPE: Civil Law Case Name: Mohinder Singh (Dead) Through L.Rs. vs. Paramjit

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation Period for Possession Suits Based on Declaratory Decrees: Mohinder Singh vs. Paramjit Singh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act to VAT revisions: Patel Brothers vs. State of Assam (2017)

/ A.K. Sikri, Abhay Manohar Sapre, Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003, Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003 with Section 81, Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003 with Section 84, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, applies to revision petitions filed in the High Court under Section 81 of the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: M/S Patel Brothers vs. State of Assam and Ors. Judgment Date: 04 January 2017 Date of the Judgment: 04

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act to VAT revisions: Patel Brothers vs. State of Assam (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top