Condonation of Delay

Supreme Court allows condonation of delay based on prospective application of law in consumer case: Dr. A. Suresh Kumar & Ors. vs. Amit Agarwal (2021) INSC 408 (08 July 2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 148, Condonation of Delay, Consumer Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Allows Condonation of Delay Based on Prospective Application of Law in Consumer Case Date of the Judgment: 08 July 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 408 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari. Can a delay in filing a written statement in a consumer case be condoned if the delay […]

Supreme Court allows condonation of delay based on prospective application of law in consumer case: Dr. A. Suresh Kumar & Ors. vs. Amit Agarwal (2021) INSC 408 (08 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the limitation period for appeals under the National Green Tribunal Act: Sridevi Datla vs. Union of India (2 March 2021)

/ Appeals under National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, Computation of time, Condonation of Delay, Environmental Clearance, Environmental Law, General Clauses Act, 1897, General Clauses Act, 1897 with Section 10, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, National Green Tribunal, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 16, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court on Limitation for NGT Appeals: Sridevi Datla vs. Union of India (2021) Date of the Judgment: 2 March 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 106 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can an appeal to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) be dismissed solely on the grounds of delay, even if the delay

Supreme Court clarifies the limitation period for appeals under the National Green Tribunal Act: Sridevi Datla vs. Union of India (2 March 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Madhya Pradesh’s Delayed Appeal, Imposes Costs: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulal (2020)

/ Condonation of Delay, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Dismisses Madhya Pradesh’s Delayed Appeal, Imposes Costs: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulal (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Condonation of delay in filing a Special Leave Petition by a government entity. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. vs. Bherulal Judgment Date: 15 October 2020 Date of the

Supreme Court Dismisses Madhya Pradesh’s Delayed Appeal, Imposes Costs: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulal (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Appeal Due to Delay in University of Delhi vs. Union of India (17 December 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Condonation of Delay, Delhi University Act, 1922, Delhi University Act, 1922 with Section 21, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Appeal Due to Delay in University of Delhi vs. Union of India LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in dismissing an appeal due to an inordinate delay in filing, despite the appellant claiming public interest. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: University of Delhi vs. Union of

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Appeal Due to Delay in University of Delhi vs. Union of India (17 December 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation with 10% Annual Increase: Huchanagouda vs. The Assistant Commissioner (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Compensation, Condonation of Delay, Judges, Land Acquisition, Market Value, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation with 10% Annual Increase: Huchanagouda vs. The Assistant Commissioner (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value and compensation for land acquisition, including the appropriate escalation rate for the gap between notifications. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Huchanagouda vs. The Assistant Commissioner and Land Acquisition Officer & Anr. Judgment

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation with 10% Annual Increase: Huchanagouda vs. The Assistant Commissioner (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Villa Possession, Rejects Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Sanjay Singh vs. Central Himalayan Land Development Co. Ltd. (21 February 2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 148, Condonation of Delay, Interim Orders, Judges, Property Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Villa Possession, Rejects Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Sanjay Singh vs. Central Himalayan Land Development Co. Ltd. (2019) Date of the Judgment: 21 February 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 166 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ashok Bhushan, J. Can a High Court reverse an order that was based on the understanding between

Supreme Court Upholds Villa Possession, Rejects Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Sanjay Singh vs. Central Himalayan Land Development Co. Ltd. (21 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Mohd. Sahid vs. Raziya Khanam (2018)

/ Appeal, Civil Procedure, Condonation of Delay, Ex-parte Decree, Indira Banerjee, Injunction, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Property Law, R. Banumathi, Sale Deed

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Mohd. Sahid vs. Raziya Khanam (2018) Date of the Judgment: October 10, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 910 Judges: R. Banumathi, J., Indira Banerjee, J. Can a party who was aware of court proceedings claim ignorance to justify a delay in filing an appeal? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Mohd. Sahid vs. Raziya Khanam (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases: Pattipati Venkateswarlu Naidu vs. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) (27 September 2018)

/ Civil Procedure, Compensation, Condonation of Delay, Delay Condonation, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition, Pomegranate Trees Compensation, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases (2018) Date of the Judgment: 27 September 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 879 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Can claimants receive enhanced compensation for acquired land even after a delay in approaching the court? The Supreme Court addressed this question while

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases: Pattipati Venkateswarlu Naidu vs. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) (27 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against DRT Order in Securitisation Act Case: M/S. Neel Enterprises vs. State Bank of India (2018)

/ Condonation of Delay, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 with Section 13(2)

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against DRT Order in Securitisation Act Case: M/S. Neel Enterprises vs. State Bank of India (2018) Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2018 Citation: M/S. Neel Enterprises & Anr. vs. State Bank of India & Anr., Civil Appeal No. 4989 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 7085/2016) Judges: Kurian Joseph,

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against DRT Order in Securitisation Act Case: M/S. Neel Enterprises vs. State Bank of India (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Limitation on Challenging Arbitration Award: AnilKumar vs. Pravinchandra (2018)

/ Arbitral Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 31(5), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Condonation of Delay, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, R. Banumathi, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Upholds Limitation on Challenging Arbitration Award: AnilKumar vs. Pravinchandra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Limitation period for challenging an arbitral award. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Anilkumar Jinabhai Patel (D) Thr. LRs. vs. Pravinchandra Jinabhai Patel and Ors. Judgment Date: 27 March 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 27 March 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC

Supreme Court Upholds Limitation on Challenging Arbitration Award: AnilKumar vs. Pravinchandra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition After Delay: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Condonation of Delay, Judges, Order XLVII, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Procedural Law, Review Petition, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition After Delay: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in curing defects in a review application should lead to its dismissal. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary (Revenue) & Anr. [Judgment Date]: March

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition After Delay: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court condones delay in filing appeal: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Essar Projects Ltd. (2013)

/ Appeal under Income Tax Act, 1961, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Condonation of Delay, Delay in Filing Appeal, Dipak Misra, H.L. Dattu, Income Tax Act, 1961, Judges

Date of the Judgment: July 08, 2013 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5338 of 2013 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.34192 of 2012) Judges: H.L. Dattu, J., Dipak Misra, J. Can a delay in filing an appeal be excused if it was due to circumstances beyond the party’s control? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court condones delay in filing appeal: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Essar Projects Ltd. (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top