Limitation Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Limitation Period under Electricity Act in Dues Recovery Cases: Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited vs. Bapuna Alcobrew Private Limited (2024) INSC 829 (4 November 2024)

/ Civil Procedure, Electricity Act, 1910, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Law, Electricity Law with Section 56(2), Issue Estoppel, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Law, Limitation Law with Article 15, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Limitation Period under Electricity Act in Dues Recovery Cases Date of the Judgment: 4 November 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 829 Judges: Dipankar Datta, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. Can a power distribution company recover dues from a consumer after a significant delay, even if the relevant electricity act doesn’t specify a […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Limitation Period under Electricity Act in Dues Recovery Cases: Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited vs. Bapuna Alcobrew Private Limited (2024) INSC 829 (4 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Adverse Possession Over Waqf Property: Sabir Ali Khan vs. Syed Mohd. Ahmad Ali Khan (2023)

/ Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Law, Limitation Law with Article 65, Limitation Law with Section 27, Uttar Pradesh Muslim Waqf Act, 1960, Waqf Act, 1995, Waqf Law, Waqf Law with Section 51(1)

Supreme Court Upholds Adverse Possession Over Waqf Property: Sabir Ali Khan vs. Syed Mohd. Ahmad Ali Khan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether title to Waqf property can be acquired through adverse possession. CASE TYPE: Waqf Law, Property Law, Limitation Law. Case Name: Sabir Ali Khan vs. Syed Mohd. Ahmad Ali Khan. [Judgment Date]: 13 April 2023

Supreme Court Upholds Adverse Possession Over Waqf Property: Sabir Ali Khan vs. Syed Mohd. Ahmad Ali Khan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the meaning of “first due” under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 in cases of incorrect billing: Assistant Engineer (D1), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited & Anr. vs. Rahamatullah Khan alias Rahamjulla (18 February 2020)

/ Consumer Law, Consumer Rights, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 56, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Limitation Law, Limitation Period, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies “First Due” Date Under Electricity Act: Ajmer Vidyut Nigam vs. Rahamatullah Khan (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “first due” in Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003, concerning the limitation period for disconnection of electricity supply due to non-payment of dues. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Consumer Law. Case Name: Assistant Engineer (D1),

Supreme Court clarifies the meaning of “first due” under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 in cases of incorrect billing: Assistant Engineer (D1), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited & Anr. vs. Rahamatullah Khan alias Rahamjulla (18 February 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top