Tenant Rights

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant’s Obligations During Eviction Appeals under Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act: Heera Traders vs. Kamla Jain (22 February 2022)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Land Law, Landlord Rights, Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 with Section 13, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Rent Law, Supreme Court Judgments, Tenant Rights

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant’s Obligations During Eviction Appeals under Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act Date of the Judgment: 22 February 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 166 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J., Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can a tenant, who has been ordered to be evicted, be required to pay market rent during the pendency of their appeal, […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant’s Obligations During Eviction Appeals under Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act: Heera Traders vs. Kamla Jain (22 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant Rights Under Chennai City Tenants Protection Act: National Company vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2021)

/ B.R. Gavai, Chennai City Tenants Protection Act, 1921, Chennai City Tenants Protection Act, 1921 with Section 3, Chennai City Tenants Protection Act, 1921 with Section 9, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Tenant Rights

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant Rights Under Chennai City Tenants Protection Act: National Company vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2021) Date of the Judgment: November 11, 2021 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 6726 of 2021 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.28057 of 2019) Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and B.R. Gavai, J. Can a tenant

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant Rights Under Chennai City Tenants Protection Act: National Company vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant Purchase Rights Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act: Vasant Ganpat Padave vs Anant Mahadev Sawant (2019) INSC 741 (18 September 2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Judges, Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 with Section 32, Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 with Section 32-F, R. Subhash Reddy, R.F. Nariman, Surya Kant, Tenant Rights

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant Purchase Rights Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant’s right to purchase land under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is affected if they are unaware of the landlord’s disability ceasing, specifically in cases of a widow’s death or a landlord’s mental or physical disability ceasing. CASE

Supreme Court Clarifies Tenant Purchase Rights Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act: Vasant Ganpat Padave vs Anant Mahadev Sawant (2019) INSC 741 (18 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right: Sakharam Ganesh Pujari vs. Husen Aba Bahadur (2017)

/ Agricultural Land, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948 with Chapter IIIAA, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948 with Section 32F, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948 with Section 32P, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Landlord Rights, Landlord-Tenant Law, S.A. Bobde, Tenant Rights

Can a tenant’s right to purchase land be extended indefinitely, even after the statutory period has expired? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948. This judgment clarifies the timelines for tenants to exercise their purchase rights, especially when a landlord has served in

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right: Sakharam Ganesh Pujari vs. Husen Aba Bahadur (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top